Workflow Orchestration for Identity and Timing Insurance Claim Initial Review

Identity and timing data has two sources. Identity verification data comes from national public security identity information verification interfaces

What Data Looks Like for This Category

Identity and timing data has two sources. Identity verification data comes from national public security identity information verification interfaces and medical insurance-linked identity archives. Timing data comes from workflow node logs of the claim system, timestamps of materials submitted by claimants, and third-party logistics delivery records. The data update rhythm is as follows: identity data is synced in real time after each verification request, while timing data is updated when each workflow node completes. The data is in structured JSON format, including fields such as identity_verify_result (boolean, verification result), report_time (ISO 8601 format timestamp), material_submit_time (ISO 8601 format), and time_interval_days (integer, unit: days).

What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Workflow Orchestration

The real-time requirement of identity data means all identity verification nodes in the workflow must call real-time interfaces, and local caching cannot be used. Otherwise, expired verification results may occur. The multi-node update feature of timing data means the workflow must listen for state changes of each node, automatically pull the latest timestamp variables after a node completes, and statically initialized variables cannot be used. The fixed format of structured JSON fields means the workflow's parameter parsing node must be configured with strict field mapping rules to avoid process interruptions caused by missing fields. The ISO format and unit requirements for time fields mean the workflow's time calculation node must adapt to format conversion to ensure normal operation of subsequent timing verification logic.

How to Set Configurations

Configuration ItemRecommended ValueRationale
http_request_timeout10000 millisecondsIdentity verification interfaces typically respond quickly. An overly short timeout will cut off valid requests, while an overly long one will block the workflow
variable_sync_modeReal-time syncTiming data is updated in real time with workflow nodes. The latest timestamp variables must be synced after each node executes
field_mapping_strictEnabledThe field formats of identity and timing data are fixed. Strict mapping can avoid process exceptions caused by missing fields
workflow_trigger_modeTriggered by node state changeUpdates of timing data depend on the completion status of workflow nodes. The latest data must be automatically pulled after each node completes
error_retry_max_times2 timesTemporary network fluctuations may occur with identity verification interfaces. Limited retries can reduce process failure rates
time_format_convert_ruleISO 8601 to timestampTime calculation within the workflow must be unified to timestamp format to adapt to subsequent timing verification logic

The parameter values provided on this page are all conventional recommendations used as starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material forms, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.

Three Common Mistakes

  • Phenomenon: The HTTP node returns the getaddrinfo ENOTFOUND error when calling the identity verification interface. Cause: Network proxy rules for the workflow were not configured when using dynamic domain name services, resulting in failed domain name resolution.
  • Phenomenon: The value of the timing variable always remains the initially hard-coded timestamp and does not update with workflow nodes. Cause: The real-time sync configuration of variable_sync_mode was not enabled. The variable is only loaded once when the workflow starts, and the latest data is not pulled again after each node completes.
  • Phenomenon: Tool execution fails when calling via the advanced orchestration tool. Cause: A model supporting structured output was not selected according to the calling requirements of the identity verification interface, and no parameter verification rules for tool calls were configured.

How to Confirm the Configuration Is Correct

  • Manually trigger the workflow once, view the return logs of the HTTP node, and confirm that the response status code of the identity verification interface is 200 OK.
  • Enter the workflow variable panel, perform simulated execution of each node in sequence, and confirm that the timestamp of the timing variable is automatically updated as each node completes.
  • Check the field mapping configuration, and confirm that all required fields have been correctly mapped with no missing items.
  • Simulate a scenario where the interface call fails, and confirm that the workflow automatically retries according to the configured number of retries, and the workflow can proceed normally after retries.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.