What Data Looks Like for This Scenario
The data for internal policy compliance scenarios comes primarily from enterprise internal compliance management systems, scanned paper policy documents, and publicly available compliance guideline documents from regulatory agencies. Data updates trigger irregularly alongside regulatory policy adjustments and internal management revisions, with no fixed cycle. Most documents use a hierarchical chapter structure, including fields such as policy number, effective date, applicable scope, clause details, and penalty clauses for violations. Individual document lengths vary widely. Clauses are subdivided into articles, paragraphs, and sub-paragraphs. Some policies linked to regulatory requirements include corresponding regulatory document numbers.
Constraints Imposed on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems
The hierarchical policy document structure requires interfaces to support retrieval by clause hierarchy. This ensures compliance question-and-answer sessions can accurately locate target clauses, avoiding positioning errors caused by returning only full text. Irregularly updated data requires interfaces to support real-time pulling or flexible synchronization cycle configuration. This prevents content lag from reliance on fixed offline synchronization. Structured fields such as effective date and policy number require interfaces to offer field-level filtering capabilities, improving retrieval accuracy. Wide variation in individual document lengths requires interfaces to have reasonable parsing timeout and content truncation threshold configurations. This prevents request timeouts or abnormal resource usage.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 300-600 seconds | Internal policy documents typically contain many hierarchical clauses, and this range covers the parsing needs of most individual policies |
RECALL_CHUNK_SIZE | 800-1200 characters | Internal policy clauses are mostly composed of short paragraphs, and this length can fully retain the semantic completeness of a single clause |
FIELD_FILTER_ENABLE | Enabled | Internal policies include structured fields such as policy number and effective date. Enabling this allows precise filtering of compliance-related documents by field |
SYNC_FREQUENCY | Triggered on demand | Internal policy updates have no fixed cycle. On-demand synchronization avoids invalid requests and content lag |
MAX_DOCUMENT_SIZE_PER_REQUEST | 50 MB | Individual internal policy documents typically do not exceed this size, which limits the occupation of interface resources by abnormally large files |
RECALL_SCORE_THRESHOLD | 0.75-0.85 | Compliance question-and-answer requires high matching accuracy. This range filters out low-relevance retrieval results |
The parameter values provided on this page are common recommendations used as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require case-by-case analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: Retrieval results do not include rearranged precise entries, or the reranking interface call fails. Cause: The API key and call parameters for the reranking model are not configured, or the reranking function is not enabled. This results in retrieval results that have not undergone secondary filtering.
- Phenomenon: After calling the chat interface, the client disconnects the SSE connection, and the database does not save chat records. Cause: Session persistence configuration is not enabled, or the interface timeout setting is too short. This results in failure to complete data storage after the request is interrupted.
- Phenomenon: Calling the interface returns a 401 error after configuring the model API key. Cause: The key is not configured in the dedicated configuration item for the corresponding model, the general interface configuration is used incorrectly, or the key format does not meet platform requirements.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Upload an internal policy document. Check if the parsed text is split by chapters and clauses, and verify the text splitting logic matches configuration requirements.
- Manually trigger a policy synchronization. Check the synchronization log to confirm whether the synchronization process follows the configured trigger rules, and verify that content updates are timely.
- Call the interface with structured field filtering conditions. Check if the returned results only include policy documents that meet the conditions, and verify that the field filtering function is working.
- Simulate the scenario where the client disconnects the SSE connection. Check if a corresponding session record is generated in the database, and verify that the session persistence configuration is working.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.