Deployment and Upgrade for Internal Policies and Compliance

Internal policy data comes from paper or electronic documents officially issued by enterprise compliance and legal departments. Update cycles are

What the data for this category looks like

Internal policy data comes from paper or electronic documents officially issued by enterprise compliance and legal departments. Update cycles are irregular, triggered by regulatory policy adjustments or internal process optimizations, with no fixed schedule. Most documents are structured long-form text, containing fields such as policy number, effective date, applicable job scope, clause details, and corresponding penalty clauses for violations. There are no unified fixed quantitative units. Some documents include attached forms and process node descriptions. The length of individual documents varies widely, from hundreds-word notices to tens of thousands-word full compliance manuals.

Constraints on Deployment and Upgrade Processes

Internal policy documents have wide length ranges and include structured metadata fields. Dedicated configurations for long-text parsing and metadata extraction are required during deployment. This prevents loss of key clauses or effective information. Update frequency has no fixed schedule. The upgrade process must support incremental synchronization and version management. This avoids mixing old and new policies, which causes deviations in the effective scope of search results. Compliance documents have high requirements for information accuracy. Strict parsing and verification rules must be configured during deployment. This prevents core compliance requirements from being missing in search results due to formatting errors. During upgrades, the metadata mapping relationship of historical policies must be retained. This ensures retrieval consistency for the existing knowledge base.

How to Configure Parameters

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS600 secondsMost internal policy documents are long-form text, and some compliance manuals include multi-page attachments. 600 seconds covers the parsing time requirements for most documents
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE2000 MBSome internal policy documents include high-definition scanned attachments and multi-page PDF collections. 2000 MB adapts to common large-file upload scenarios
Segment Length1500–2000 charactersInternal policy clauses are mostly coherent structured paragraphs. This segment length preserves complete clause context, avoiding loss of associated logic after splitting
Knowledge Base Metadata MappingMap the Policy Number and Effective Date fields in the documentCompliance searches require precise positioning of the effective scope and unique identifier of the corresponding policy, enabling quick filtering of target documents
Enable Enhanced PDF ParsingEnabled via toggleMost internal policies are official documents in PDF format. Enhanced parsing preserves original layout and text structure, reducing information loss after parsing
Incremental Sync Trigger RuleTriggered by file modification timeMost internal policy updates modify existing documents. Triggering by modification time accurately identifies incremental update content, avoiding resource consumption from full synchronization

The parameter values provided on this page are common recommended starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material format, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require individual analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.

Three Common Configuration Mistakes

  • Symptom: After enabling the enhanced PDF parsing function, parsing of internal policy PDF documents fails, returning connection timeout errors. Cause: When deploying MinerU locally, the service address was not correctly configured in FastGPT's parsing settings, or the MinerU container port was not opened to the network environment where FastGPT is deployed.
  • Symptom: In version 4.14.4, a configured and enabled model does not appear in the workflow's model selection list. Cause: The model configuration was not synchronized to the corresponding workflow cluster, or the model enablement status was not correctly saved to the global configuration.
  • Symptom: Updated internal policy documents cannot be retrieved, and search results for existing documents remain unchanged. Cause: Incremental sync trigger rules were not configured, or the sync task did not identify updated content by file modification time, resulting in only full synchronization being performed without overwriting old documents.

How to Verify Successful Configuration

  • Upload a single internal policy test document, verify the matching degree between the parsed text content and the original document, and confirm that metadata fields have been correctly extracted.
  • Navigate to the knowledge base parsing configuration page, check the enhanced PDF parsing toggle status and MinerU service address configuration, and run a connectivity test to verify normal service connection.
  • Trigger an incremental sync task, review the execution results in the sync logs, and confirm that updated documents have been correctly identified and synchronized to the knowledge base.
  • In the model selection node of the workflow, check if configured models appear in the optional list, verifying that model configurations have been synchronized to the workflow environment.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.