What This Category of Data Looks Like
Penalty case data is primarily sourced from internal enterprise compliance management systems, publicly available regulatory agency notification documents, and compliance archives. Update frequency is adjusted based on the timing of penalty event occurrences. Internal penalty cases are updated synchronously with the archiving process, while regulatory cases are updated according to the notification release cycle. Each individual document includes fields such as penalty document number, penalty subject, description of violation behavior, applicable regulatory clauses, penalty measures, rectification requirements, and more. Penalty amounts are measured in yuan. Rectification periods are measured in calendar days. There is no uniform fixed length; individual documents range from hundreds to thousands of characters.
Constraints Imposed on Multi-turn Dialogue and Prompt Engineering
Decentralized data sources require multi-turn dialogue to support cross-system compliance document retrieval. The retrieval scope specified in the prompt must explicitly include internal archives and regulatory notifications. The rich, fixed field structure requires the prompt to preset field extraction rules to avoid generating irrelevant content. The wide variation in individual document lengths means the multi-turn dialogue context window must adapt to long text segments. It is also necessary to anchor the specific penalty case under discussion in each interaction to prevent context confusion. Update frequency is inconsistent, so a dynamic retrieval mechanism must be configured to ensure the latest penalty case data is used for each dialogue call.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
maxContext | 8000–10000 characters | Adapts to the maximum length of individual penalty case documents while retaining context information required for multi-turn dialogue |
recallTopK | Top 6 entries | Covers both internal compliance archives and regulatory notification sources, avoiding redundant retrieved content |
rerankScoreThreshold | 0.75 | Filters low-relevance penalty cases to ensure retrieved content is strongly correlated with user questions |
promptTemplate | Fixed template: Please combine the penalty cases in {recalldocs} to answer the user's question about {targetcase}, and explicitly reference the penalty document number and applicable regulatory clauses | Clarifies field extraction rules, avoids generating irrelevant content, and mandates reference to compliance basis |
CHAT_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT | 60 seconds | Adapts to the query time required for cross-source retrieval of penalty cases, preventing session interruption due to timeout mid-conversation |
sessionTrackType | Anchor context by case ID | Locks the specific penalty case under discussion during multi-turn dialogue to prevent context confusion |
The parameter values provided on this page are all common recommended starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to test against your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Misconfiguration Issues
- Phenomenon: Waiting time exceeds 3 seconds when initiating a conversation for the first time, with normal speed for subsequent interactions. Cause: The first conversation requires cross-source retrieval of the latest penalty case data, and the absence of a local caching mechanism leads to repeated pulls.
- Phenomenon: Penalty document numbers or regulatory clauses are not included in the dialogue response results. Cause: The prompt template does not explicitly require referencing specified fields, or the retrieved documents did not correctly extract the corresponding fields.
- Phenomenon: After switching to discuss a different penalty case during a session, the results still relate to the previous case. Cause: No session tracking rule for anchoring context by case ID is configured, and the context was not reset or anchored.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Initiate a single-turn dialogue, input a question containing specific penalty case keywords, and verify whether the returned results include the fields required by the preset prompt template.
- Initiate a multi-turn dialogue, first query one penalty case, then switch to ask a question about a different case, and verify whether the returned results relate to the currently discussed case.
- Initiate a first conversation and subsequent multi-turn interactions separately, and verify whether the difference between the first response time and subsequent response times matches expectations.
- Adjust the recall quantity parameter, and verify whether the number of returned penalty cases matches the configured
recallTopKvalue.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.