What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Penalty case data primarily comes from internal corporate compliance penalty archives and public regulatory agency notification documents. There is no fixed batch cycle for data updates. Internal penalty records are synchronized in real time after violation incident handling is completed. Regulatory notifications are updated according to the release schedule of regulatory bodies. A single penalty case document typically includes structured fields such as penalty document number, violation determination, applicable compliance clauses, specific penalty measures, rectification requirements, and implementation time limit. Some documents also include attachments such as on-site inspection records and rectification supporting materials.
Constraints Imposed on Model Access and Configuration Workflow
The multi-source data requirement means the configuration must support two access methods: internal system API docking and public web crawling. It must also distinguish permission verification rules for internal sensitive data and public data. The real-time update feature requires enabling an incremental synchronization mechanism to avoid system resource occupation from full-volume repeated pulls. The characteristics of multiple structured fields and attached attachments require enabling the field extraction and attachment parsing switches. Reasonable segmentation rules must be set for long text segments such as penalty measures and rectification requirements. The sensitivity of compliance content requires enabling sensitive information filtering parameters to avoid leakage of non-compliant content.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
maxContext | 8000–12000 characters | Penalty cases often include multiple sections of compliance clauses, violation details, and penalty measures. A long context can retain the complete logical chain |
RECALL_TOP_K | Top 6–10 entries | Penalty cases need to associate multi-dimensional information such as violation behavior, applicable clauses, and rectification requirements. Excessive recall will introduce irrelevant content |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 300 seconds | Penalty cases may include large rectification supporting attachments. Sufficient time is required to complete format parsing and content extraction |
SENSITIVE_FILTER_ENABLE | Enabled | Penalty cases include compliance-sensitive content. Filtering non-compliant expressions and sensitive information meets internal compliance requirements |
INCREMENTAL_SYNC_INTERVAL | Hourly | Internal penalty records are generated in real time with incidents, and regulatory notifications are updated daily. Hourly synchronization balances timeliness and resource usage |
ATTACHMENT_PARSE_ENABLE | Enabled | Most penalty cases include attachments such as on-site inspection records and rectification reports. Attachment content must be parsed and included in the knowledge base |
The parameter values provided on this page are conventional recommendations used as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material format, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis. Testing on internal samples is recommended before finalizing configuration settings.
Three Common Configuration Errors
- Phenomenon: An error
No available channel for model whisper-1 under group defaultis returned when calling the model. Cause: No dedicated model group is created for the penalty case voice query scenario, or no compliant channel configuration supporting speech recognition models is bound to the group. - Phenomenon: The model cannot accurately match compliance clauses in penalty cases after training. Cause: No structured penalty case dataset is used for fine-tuning, or no field-level training annotation configuration is enabled.
- Phenomenon: No compliant reading content is generated after configuring the TTS model. Cause: No valid voice parameters are filled in
TTS_VOICE_CONFIGaccording to model requirements, or the configured voice does not match the list supported by the model.
How to Confirm Configuration Is Complete
- Manually upload a single penalty case document, check if the extracted fields in the knowledge base include core content such as penalty document number, violation behavior, and penalty measures, to confirm the parsing configuration is effective.
- Initiate a compliance query request, check if the number of returned results matches the configured recall range, to confirm the recall parameter is effective.
- Trigger an incremental synchronization task, check if new penalty cases are automatically synchronized to the knowledge base, to confirm the incremental synchronization configuration is effective.
- Simulate a sensitive compliance query, check if the model filters non-compliant expressions, to confirm the sensitive information filtering configuration is effective.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.