What data in this category looks like
Military electronics investment research data comes from multiple sources. These include industry statistical data released by the State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, periodic reports such as annual, semi-annual, and quarterly reports of listed military electronics enterprises, research reports from the China Electronic Components Industry Association, public technical documents of military scientific research institutes, patent authorization announcement texts, and national military standard documents.
Data forms cover structured statistical reports, technical parameter documents, announcement texts, and more. Structured reports have clear statistical units and cycle fields. Technical documents often contain long sections of professional parameter descriptions. Announcement texts are marked with release dates and issuing entities.
Update frequencies vary significantly across sources. Periodic reports update quarterly or annually. Industry dynamics update in real time. Standard documents have longer update cycles.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the citation source and traceability link
The multi-form and multi-source features of military electronics investment research data create clear constraints for the traceability link.
Structured statistical reports must be linked to clear fields such as issuing unit and statistical cycle to ensure accurate traceability. Technical patent documents must match exclusive identifiers such as public number and application date to avoid confusion with technical documents of other electronic categories.
Differences in update frequencies across sources require traceability rules to adapt to the release cycle of corresponding data. For example, periodic report data must be divided into quarterly traceability intervals to prevent incorrect cross-cycle associations.
The long text structure of some professional technical documents also requires retaining context associations during traceability. Isolated parameter fragments alone cannot be used for traceability.
How to configure settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value Range | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
recall count | Top 8–12 entries | Military electronics data has many segmented categories and dense professional parameters. A sufficient number of recalled documents are needed to cover core investment research dimensions and avoid missing key information |
similarity threshold | 0.72–0.85 | Military electronics has a high proportion of professional terms. Appropriately raising the threshold can avoid recalling irrelevant general electronic industry data |
segment length | 1000–1200 characters | Military electronics technical documents often contain long sections of parameter descriptions. Matching the segment length to the structure of such documents retains the context associated with parameters |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 200 MB | Military electronics industry reports are mostly large PDF or Excel format documents. The upper limit of uploaded file size needs to be raised |
reorder return count | Top 4–6 entries | Core traceability documents with precise matching must be retained. Excessive redundant information can interfere with the large model's citation logic |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 300 seconds | Parsing large military electronics technical documents takes a long time. Extending the timeout period prevents parsing failures |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing the settings.
Three common configuration mistakes
- Phenomenon: After adjusting the
recall countparameter to 2000, the large model output does not contain any citation sources. Cause: The number of recalled documents exceeds the upper limit of the system context window, causing the citation association logic to fail to extract valid traceability information. - Phenomenon: When calling an external API to obtain knowledge base citation content, the returned result has no source field of the original document. Cause: The "retain traceability fields" option is not enabled in the knowledge base configuration, or the API request does not specify the parameter for returning traceability information.
- Phenomenon: The citation function works normally in local testing, but cannot obtain correct citation sources when called in an external deployment environment. Cause: The external deployment environment does not synchronize the configuration of the knowledge base's data source path mapping, resulting in failure to associate the storage location of the original document during traceability.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Upload a military electronics industry standard document, and check whether the parsed data includes preset traceability fields such as issuing unit and release date.
- Initiate a knowledge base recall test, and verify that the number of returned documents matches the configured
recall countvalue. - Call the external API interface, and check whether the returned result includes traceability information such as the source link and release time of the original document.
- Adjust the
similarity thresholdto the boundary test value, and verify that the recall results meet the expected professional matching degree.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.