What the data for this category looks like
Medical aesthetics investment research data is sourced from national medical aesthetics product registration databases, public practice registration information of medical aesthetics institutions, diagnosis and treatment standards released by industry associations, de-identified clinical treatment records, and academic journal research papers.
Update rhythms vary across data types: Regulatory filing data updates with product registration and approval progress. Institutional operation data updates with quarterly business adjustments. Clinical research literature is indexed in real time as journals publish new content.
Document structures include product registration forms (with product name, registration certificate number, manufacturer, applicable scope), diagnosis and treatment project lists (with project code, charging standard, consumable model), and clinical research reports (with treatment plan, follow-up records). Fields include registration certificate number, practice scope, consumable usage unit, charging unit price unit, and more.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the citation sources and traceability link?
The multiple sources and differentiated update rhythms of medical aesthetics investment research data require the traceability link to clearly mark the collection time and official filing number of each data entry, to avoid mixing expired information.
Differences in compliance attributes across document types require traceability processes to distinguish the display boundaries of practice registration, product registration, and clinical data. Reference to diagnosis and treatment information beyond an institution’s practice scope is not allowed.
Fields include clear unit identifiers, so the traceability link must retain the original unit information of fields, and must not modify or omit them without authorization.
De-identified clinical data must be marked with a de-identification mark to ensure referenced content complies with medical data compliance requirements.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
topK | Top 8-12 entries | Medical aesthetics investment research data includes multi-dimensional registration, clinical, and institutional information. Sufficient candidate sources are required to ensure citation accuracy |
scoreThreshold | 0.75-0.85 | Medical aesthetics data has strong professionalism. Low-relevance results must be filtered, while retaining niche clinical research data in specific subfields |
citationFormat | {Source Name} ({Registration/Filing Number}, {Collection Time}) | Medical aesthetics data must be linked to official filing numbers and collection times to meet compliance traceability requirements |
knowledgeBaseRefreshInterval | 7 days (for regulatory filing data) / 1 day (for clinical research data) | The update rhythms of different medical aesthetics data vary greatly. Batch-configured refresh intervals ensure data timeliness |
sensitiveFieldMask | De-identified patient information, detailed institutional addresses | Medical aesthetics clinical data involves privacy. Sensitive fields must be filtered before citation |
citationDisplayMode | Only display source abstracts and numbers | Avoid exposing redundant content of original documents, which meets the concise traceability requirements of investment research scenarios |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing.
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: When calling the knowledge base search node in a workflow, no optional options appear in the citation variable dropdown menu. Reason: No variable of knowledge base ID type was created in the global variable configuration, or the variable is not bound to the permission scope of the corresponding knowledge base.
- Phenomenon: The original content of the knowledge base search input and response is displayed in the generated answer. Reason: The rule of only displaying abstracts for
citationDisplayModewas not configured, or the original log output of tool calls was not blocked in the workflow. - Phenomenon: Expired filing numbers are shown for referenced medical aesthetics product data. Reason:
knowledgeBaseRefreshIntervalwas not batch-configured by data type, resulting in old filing data not being updated in a timely manner.
How to Confirm Proper Configuration
- Enter the knowledge base management page, check whether the
knowledgeBaseRefreshIntervalconfiguration is set in batches by data type. - Initiate a medical aesthetics investment research query, check whether the citation section of the generated answer includes the source name, filing number, and collection time.
- Test the function of dynamically specifying the knowledge base, confirm that the citation variable dropdown menu in the workflow can display the configured global variables.
- View the tool call log, confirm that the original content of the knowledge base search input and response is not output.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.