HTTP Interfaces and External Systems for Water Treatment Intelligent Due Diligence Reports

The data for water treatment intelligent due diligence reports primarily originates from on-site water monitoring terminals, water treatment equipment

What the data for this category looks like

The data for water treatment intelligent due diligence reports primarily originates from on-site water monitoring terminals, water treatment equipment PLC control systems, and local ecological environment regulatory platforms. Data update cycles fall into two categories: real-time monitoring parameters refresh every 1 to 5 minutes, and batch summary reports are generated each calendar day. A single report document has four structural modules: basic point information, core water quality indicators, equipment operating parameters, and compliance verification results. Fields include point number, turbidity (NTU), COD concentration (mg/L), total phosphorus content (mg/L), equipment operating duration (hours), and compliance status. Some fields include timestamp and equipment number association information.

Constraints imposed on HTTP interfaces and external systems by these characteristics

The high-frequency real-time refresh requirement for water treatment due diligence data means HTTP interfaces must support short-interval polling or Webhook push, to avoid data delays that disrupt subsequent analysis. Single batch reports have large file sizes, so interfaces must support chunked upload configurations to prevent request timeouts. Fields include water quality parameters with specific units, so interface parameter validation rules must bind field names to their corresponding units, to prevent invalid data from being submitted. Compliance verification results must be synchronized to the regulatory platform, so interfaces must be configured with two-way data transfer permissions, to ensure due diligence results can be sent back to external systems. Additionally, the association between equipment numbers and point numbers must be passed via interface parameters, to avoid data matching errors that reduce the accuracy of due diligence results.

Configuration settings

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
API_REQUEST_TIMEOUT300 secondsWater treatment batch due diligence report data has a large volume, and standard timeout durations are insufficient to complete full data transfer and parsing
MAX_BATCH_RECORDS50 records/requestThe volume of real-time monitoring data reported per batch typically falls within this range, which prevents interface request overload
FIELD_VALIDATION_SWITCHEnabledWater treatment parameters have fixed unit and format requirements, enabling validation filters invalid submitted data
WEBHOOK_RETRY_TIMES3 retriesLocal regulatory platforms may experience temporary response delays, multiple retries ensure successful data synchronization
CHUNK_UPLOAD_THRESHOLD10 MBSingle batch due diligence reports typically exceed this threshold, enabling chunked uploads to improve transmission stability
PRESERVE_CHAT_IDAlways EnabledSession identifiers must be retained across requests to ensure contextual consistency throughout the due diligence workflow

The parameter values provided on this page are general recommendations to serve as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis, and it is recommended to test with your own samples before finalizing settings.

Three common configuration errors

  • Issue: Session context is lost when calling the interface multiple times, preventing continuation of the due diligence analysis workflow. Cause: The PRESERVE_CHAT_ID configuration is not enabled, and a new session identifier is generated for each request, making context reuse impossible.
  • Issue: The interface returns a 413 Request Entity Too Large status code. Cause: The CHUNK_UPLOAD_THRESHOLD configuration is not set, and the batch report volume exceeds the single-transmission limit of the interface.
  • Issue: Submitted water quality parameters do not match their corresponding units, and the interface returns a 400 Bad Request status code. Cause: The FIELD_VALIDATION_SWITCH is not enabled, and field units and formats are not validated, resulting in invalid submitted data.

How to confirm the configuration is correct

  • Send an upload request for a single batch report, observe the interface return status code, and adjust the chunked upload threshold to a value matching the current report volume.
  • Send three consecutive real-time data reporting requests, check if the session identifiers are consistent, and confirm that the session retention configuration is active.
  • Submit test data that does not match the required unit format, check if the interface returns a validation failure prompt, and confirm that the field validation switch is enabled.
  • Configure a Webhook callback address, send a synchronization request, then check if the external system has received complete data, and confirm that the retry count configuration covers temporary network fluctuations.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.