What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Intelligent due diligence report data for automotive components is primarily sourced from original equipment manufacturer (OEM) BOM systems, supplier qualification filing databases, third-party testing institution reports, and supply chain logistics ledgers. Data updates are triggered by new vehicle model project initiation, supplier qualification annual reviews, or parts compliance random inspection results, with no fixed schedule. A single due diligence document typically includes structured fields such as the unique part number, material model, supplier unified social credit code, compliance certificate number, mechanical performance parameters (units: MPa, N·m), and batch traceability code. It also includes attachments like test report PDF files and supplier audit meeting minutes.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Deployment and Upgrade
The multi-attachment nature of automotive component due diligence data requires deployments to support large file parsing and multi-format synchronization, with sufficient reserved file processing queue resources. The lack of fixed update cycles requires upgrade processes to support incremental data pulling, avoiding full synchronization to reduce excessive server bandwidth usage. Structured fields that include specific physical units require deployment configurations for field mapping rules, to retain unit information after parsing and prevent parameter ambiguity in downstream analysis. The unique part number, as a core index field, requires a dedicated index to be configured during vector database deployment to ensure retrieval efficiency. Encrypted transmission requirements for compliance attachments also require security configuration items for data transmission to be updated during upgrades.
How to Configure the Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | Automotive component due diligence reports often include multiple high-definition test report PDF files, which have long parsing times. 600 seconds covers most large attachment parsing requirements. |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 1000 MB | A single due diligence report may include multiple supplier audit minutes and test scans. 1000 MB meets attachment upload limits for most scenarios. |
VECTOR_SEARCH_TOP_K | Top 8 results | Automotive component data fields are closely related. Retrieving 8 results covers core associated information and avoids redundant data interfering with search results. |
FIELD_PRESERVE_UNIT | Enabled | Structured test parameters include physical units such as MPa and N·m. Enabling this configuration retains unit information and prevents parameter ambiguity in downstream analysis. |
DATA_SYNC_INCREMENTAL | Enabled | Automotive component due diligence data updates have no fixed schedule. Enabling incremental synchronization reduces server bandwidth usage and storage resource consumption. |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require individual analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Errors
- Phenomenon: The interface continues loading after a conversation is initiated, and backend logs return a 504 Gateway Timeout error. Cause: The
CHAT_RESPONSE_TIMEOUTconfiguration was not adjusted. Multi-attachment parsing for automotive component due diligence reports occupies excessive response time, and the default timeout threshold does not support business requirements. - Phenomenon: Local component test report attachments fail to load after offline deployment. Cause: The
LOCAL_FILE_ACCESS_PERMISSIONconfiguration was not enabled for local file read access, so the offline environment cannot access due diligence document attachments stored locally. - Phenomenon: Physical unit information for some components is lost after data is migrated from an existing deployment environment. Cause: The
FIELD_PRESERVE_UNITconfiguration was not enabled. The parsing process automatically strips unit information from test parameters, leading to parameter ambiguity in downstream retrieval.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Correct
- Upload an automotive component due diligence document that includes multiple test attachments, and check whether the parsing progress completes within the preset timeout period.
- Initiate a conversation with a query for component parameters, verify that the response time meets business expectations, and adjust the corresponding timeout configurations to match actual time consumption.
- Export full deployment data, check whether the backup file includes custom structured fields, and confirm that the field mapping configurations are effective.
- Disconnect the external network, attempt to load a local due diligence document, and confirm that the local file access permission configuration is correct and attachments can be accessed normally.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.