What the data for this category looks like
Paint and ink-related due diligence data primarily comes from publicly available test reports from official national paint quality inspection institutions, factory quality inspection sheets from upstream and downstream suppliers, and annual performance indicator documents from industry associations. Raw material performance parameters are updated every 1 to 3 months with each batch, while national standard compliance items are revised every six months. A single document typically includes test items such as raw material composition, viscosity, adhesion, and weather resistance. Fields include fineness (unit: micrometers), drying time (unit: hours), VOC emissions (unit: grams per liter), and compliance labels for the corresponding production batch.
What constraints these characteristics impose on tool calling and plugins
The multi-source heterogeneous nature, differing update cycles, and inconsistent field units of paint and ink data create clear constraints for tool calling and plugins. Multi-source data requires tools to support configuring access permissions and pull paths for multiple external data sources. Different update frequencies require tools to set synchronization cycles for raw material parameters and compliance items separately. The diversity of fields and units requires plugins to include built-in standard mapping rules to automatically convert unit descriptions from different sources. Complex document structures require plugins to support custom field extraction rules to adapt to different formats of quality inspection reports and compliance documents.
How to set the configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 1200 seconds | Paint and ink-related quality inspection reports usually contain multiple sets of performance parameters. A single document takes longer to parse, so this setting must accommodate long-document parsing needs |
pluginRequestTimeout | 600 seconds | Queries to external data sources such as industry association databases may have response delays, so sufficient request duration must be reserved |
toolCallRetryCount | 2 times | Raw material data pulls may fail due to network fluctuations. Limited retries can reduce call failure rates |
pluginCustomFieldMapping | Map by test item name to standard fields | Field naming in quality inspection reports from different suppliers varies. Unified mapping is required to match the standard fields needed for due diligence reports |
pluginUnitConversionEnabled | Enabled | Performance parameter units from different data sources differ. Automatic unit conversion is required to ensure report consistency |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 500 MB | Collections of quality inspection reports for multiple batches of a single paint and ink raw material typically have large file sizes, so this setting must accommodate large file uploads |
The parameter values provided on this page are common recommended starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require individual analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three common mistakes
- Scenario: A custom plugin returns missing fields when called, and the interface displays a parameter mismatch error. Cause: The
pluginCustomFieldMappingrule is not configured, so paint and ink-specific test fields returned by external interfaces cannot be mapped to standard report fields. - Scenario: Tool calling prompts "API call quota exceeded" but the account balance still has remaining funds. Cause: The plugin's request authentication parameters are not configured, causing the external interface to incorrectly identify FastGPT calls as unauthorized requests and trigger third-party interface quota limits.
- Scenario: When the knowledge base parses Word documents for paint and ink, fields such as fineness and drying time are extracted as empty. Cause: The
pluginUnitConversionEnabledconfiguration is not enabled, or the non-standard field naming in the document is not adapted.
How to confirm the configuration is correct
- Initiate a simulated tool call, and check whether the returned fields match the preset custom field mapping rules.
- Upload a standard paint and ink quality inspection document, and check whether the parsed performance parameter fields are complete and have consistent units.
- Simulate a short network delay scenario to verify whether the tool call retry mechanism triggers as configured.
- View the detailed logs of plugin calls to confirm that the request timeout settings match actual business requirements.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.