What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Refining and chemical due diligence report data comes primarily from internal production reports, equipment operation logs, compliance test reports, and supply chain collaboration documents. Updates follow a monthly schedule, with synchronous updates during major equipment overhauls or process adjustments.
Document structures typically include modules such as core equipment parameter tables, material balance logs, energy consumption accounting details, and environmental compliance test items. Fields and units follow clear professional specifications. For example, equipment processing load uses "tons per hour" as its unit, material loss uses "kilograms per ton of processed volume", and environmental emission indicators use "mg/m³".
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Multi-turn Dialogue and Prompt Engineering
Refining and chemical due diligence report documents have large file sizes, often exceeding 5000 characters per single copy. Multi-turn dialogue flows must retain sufficient context to maintain reference relationships for professional terminology.
The professional standardization of fields and units requires prompt engineering to define clear validation rules, preventing unit confusion in responses. Differences in update schedules require multi-turn dialogue to distinguish between historical data and newly updated log content, avoiding the use of outdated information.
Parsing and retrieving large-volume documents increases interaction latency. The retrieval scope and context length for single interactions must be limited.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
maxContext | 8000–12000 characters | Single refining and chemical due diligence report documents often exceed 5000 characters, requiring retention of context logic for multi-turn interactions |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | 10MB-level Word documents require extended processing time to avoid task interruptions |
retrieval count | Top 8–12 entries | Refining and chemical data has many fields, requiring sufficient retrieval of equipment parameters and compliance test data |
similarity threshold | 0.75–0.85 | Refining and chemical professional terminology is abundant, requiring filtering of low-match irrelevant document content |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 15 MB | Refining and chemical due diligence reports often reach 10MB-level sizes, raising the upper limit to prevent upload failures |
system_prompt | Must explicitly require matching refining and chemical data field units, and distinguishing between historical and newly updated log content | Restrict response logic for multi-turn dialogue, aligning with professional specifications for refining and chemical due diligence reports |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require individual analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Issue: Knowledge base association results return empty when calling the dialogue interface. Cause: The corresponding refining and chemical due diligence knowledge base is not bound in the dialogue configuration, or the knowledge base retrieval switch is not enabled.
- Issue: 10MB-level Word document parsing times out, returning status code 504. Cause: The
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDSsetting is lower than the actual required parsing duration, and the timeout parameter is not adjusted for large-volume refining and chemical documents. - Issue: Unit confusion appears in multi-turn dialogue responses, such as incorrectly writing "tons per hour" equipment load as "liters per minute". Cause: The prompt engineering does not explicitly embed unit validation and data timeliness rules for refining and chemical data, causing the response optimization logic to deviate from scenario requirements.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Upload a single 10MB-level refining and chemical due diligence report, confirm that the parsing task completes within the configured timeout period.
- Launch multi-turn questions involving refining and chemical equipment parameters, check that the dialogue context retains previous rounds' professional terminology and unit information.
- Adjust the similarity threshold, verify that the number of retrieval results changes appropriately with threshold adjustments.
- Call the dialogue interface bound to the knowledge base, confirm that the returned results include refining and chemical data content from the knowledge base.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.