What the Data for This Category Looks Like
The data sources for comprehensive service intelligent due diligence reports cover three public and compliant data source types: industrial and commercial public disclosure systems, enterprise credit reporting agencies, and industry regulatory platforms. Data update frequency varies by source. Industrial and commercial information is synchronized every quarter. Credit reports are updated according to the institution’s reporting cycle. Regulatory documents are updated in real time.
The document structure mixes structured fields and unstructured attachments. Structured fields include subject name, unified social credit code, risk level, number of compliance records, and more. Unstructured attachments include enterprise annual report scan copies, compliance rectification notices, and more. All fields have clear enumeration or unit constraints. For example, the risk level uses the enumeration values low/medium/high, and the number of compliance records uses "count" as the unit.
Constraints on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems
The need to access multiple data sources requires the system to support external interfaces using different protocols. Some credit reporting interfaces use the SOAP protocol, while industrial and commercial interfaces use the REST protocol. The system must adapt to different request formats and authentication methods.
Differences in data update frequencies require configuring differentiated synchronization frequencies for different data sources. This avoids unnecessary resource consumption from high-frequency calls to interfaces with low update rates.
Enumeration and unit constraints for structured fields require strict validation of interface request and return parameters. This prevents invalid data from entering subsequent processing workflows.
The need to parse unstructured attachments requires the interface to support uploading and parsing multi-format files. This adapts to different types of due diligence report attachments.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
external_data_source_list | ["gsxt_api", "credit_report_api", "regulatory_doc_api"] | Comprehensive service intelligent due diligence reports need to cover the three core data sources of industrial and commercial, credit reporting, and regulatory |
api_request_timeout | 300 seconds | External data source interfaces generally have slow response times; this avoids interrupting the data pull process due to timeout |
parse_chunk_size | 800–1200 characters | Due diligence reports contain long-text compliance records; this chunk size balances parsing accuracy and context association effectiveness |
field_validation_mode | strict | Due diligence report fields must strictly match preset enumeration values and unit requirements to avoid invalid data |
sync_interval | 3600 seconds | Public data source update cycles are mostly hourly; this interval balances real-time performance and interface call frequency |
error_retry_times | 3 times | External interfaces occasionally experience fluctuations; a retry mechanism reduces the rate of synchronization failures |
The parameter values provided on this page are common recommended starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material format, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: Calling an external credit reporting interface returns
403 Forbidden, with a prompt that the token does not have permission to access the specified interface. Cause: The outbound IP whitelist for FastGPT was not configured on the external service platform, resulting in interface authentication failure. - Symptom: An
ETIMEDOUTerror occurs when synchronizing due diligence report data, and the returned result is empty. Cause: The setapi_request_timeoutvalue is shorter than the actual response time of the external interface, resulting in connection timeout. - Symptom: The parsed due diligence report field
risk_levelcontains non-enumeration values, such as "medium-level" instead of the preset "medium". Cause: Thefield_validation_modewas not set tostrict, and no validity checks were performed on field values.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Call the test interface with simulated due diligence report subject information, and check whether the returned structured fields match the preset enumeration values.
- View the interface call logs to confirm that all data sources configured in
external_data_source_listcan return valid data normally. - Adjust the
sync_intervalparameter to verify that the scheduled synchronization task triggers as expected and updates data. - Simulate an interface failure scenario to trigger the abnormal retry logic, and confirm that the retry mechanism executes according to the configured
error_retry_times.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.