Deployment and Upgrade for Refractory Material Intelligent Due Diligence Reports

Data for refractory material intelligent due diligence reports comes primarily from factory quality inspection documents of production enterprises

What the data for this category looks like

Data for refractory material intelligent due diligence reports comes primarily from factory quality inspection documents of production enterprises, kiln operation condition records, test reports from third-party testing institutions, and public compliance documents from industry associations. Update rhythms vary by source: factory quality inspection files update with production batches, operation condition records update with kiln operation cycles, and industry compliance documents update quarterly. Single reports have a fixed structure, including material grade, chemical composition components, physical performance parameters, application scenario adaptation records, and supplier qualification verification information. Fields include grade number, component content, compressive strength, load softening temperature, with units of number, mass parts, megapascals, and degrees Celsius respectively.

What constraints do these characteristics impose on deployment and upgrade?

The multi-source heterogeneous nature of refractory material due diligence data requires configuring format adaptation rules for multi-source data access during deployment. These rules adapt to the different field structures of quality inspection documents, operation condition records, and compliance documents. Batch production data updates require configuring scheduled tasks for incremental synchronization. This avoids excessive system resource occupation from full pull operations. Differences in physical performance parameter units require configuring unit mapping rules. These rules unify retrieval and matching logic for units such as megapascals and degrees Celsius. Long document structures require adjusting parsing timeout parameters and context window configurations. This adapts to the content volume of a single report.

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS600 secondsSingle refractory material due diligence reports have large content volumes, requiring sufficient time reserved for file parsing
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE1000 MBAdapts to the maximum file volume limit for a single complete due diligence report
maxContext8000–12000 charactersFully carries content including multiple segments of parameters such as chemical composition and physical performance in the report
RECALL_TOP_KTop 8 entriesCovers retrieval results of multi-dimensional parameters of refractory material due diligence data, meeting recall requirements for associated fields
SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD0.75–0.85Filters low-relevance non-refractory material data, retaining accurately matched due diligence content
INCREMENTAL_SYNC_INTERVALEvery 1 hourBalances the real-time synchronization requirement for kiln operation condition records and system resource occupation

The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require case-by-case analysis, and testing on local samples is recommended before finalizing settings.

Three Common Errors

  • Phenomenon: A port occupation error occurs when executing docker-compose up, with return status code EADDRINUSE. Cause: The locally occupied target port is not closed in advance, or the PORT configuration item in docker-compose.yml is not modified.
  • Phenomenon: After configuring BASE_URL, no new entries appear in the platform model list, and the deployed model cannot be selected. Cause: The API_KEY configuration item in config.json is not updated synchronously, or the service is not restarted to load the updated configuration.
  • Phenomenon: The number of files uploaded to the knowledge base exceeds the preset limit, and refractory material due diligence reports cannot be added further. Cause: The UPLOAD_FILE_LIMIT configuration item in config.json is not adjusted, or the image is not rebuilt to apply the configuration changes.

How to Confirm Configuration Completion

  • Run the docker ps command. Confirm the deployed container is in running status, with no abnormally exited logs present.
  • Upload a small refractory material quality inspection report. Check that complete field content is displayed after parsing, with no parsing failure prompts.
  • After configuring the incremental synchronization task, view the data synchronization logs. Confirm synchronization actions are triggered at the set interval.
  • Initiate a retrieval targeting refractory material grades. Check that the field matching degree of the recall results conforms to the preset similarity rules.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.