What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for communication equipment smart due diligence reports comes from carrier centralized procurement announcements, official technical whitepapers from equipment manufacturers, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology communication equipment network access license announcements, third-party testing institution performance test reports, and operation and maintenance logs. Data update rhythm follows equipment firmware iterations and centralized procurement batch adjustments. There is no fixed cycle, but core parameters are updated at least once per quarter. Document structure splits into four modules: basic equipment parameters, interface specifications, compliance certifications, and operation and maintenance indicators. Fields include radio frequency bands, transmission rates, operating temperature ranges, network access license numbers, supplier qualification document numbers, and some fields use dedicated units.
What Constraints These Characteristics Impose on Workflow Orchestration
The multi-source nature of communication equipment due diligence data requires workflows to include multi-source data alignment nodes. These nodes verify consistency of parameters across different channels. The lack of a fixed update cycle requires workflows to support dynamic trigger-based pulling. This adaptation supports temporarily updated centralized procurement or compliance announcement data. The fixed document structure requires workflows to use structured extraction rules. These rules accurately match core fields such as radio frequency bands and network access license numbers. Unit differences in numeric fields require workflows to include built-in unit conversion logic. This logic unifies unit formats from different sources and verifies whether parameters meet compliance thresholds.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | Technical documents for communication equipment are often lengthy; 600 seconds covers the entire process of multi-source document parsing and parameter verification |
recall_top_k | Top 8 entries | Communication equipment due diligence requires coverage of multi-dimensional parameters; recalling the top 8 entries balances recall rate and processing efficiency |
similarity_threshold | 0.75–0.85 | Communication equipment parameters are standardized numerical values; this threshold filters low-relevance non-official documents and retains data from authoritative sources |
field_mapping_rule | Map by dedicated field names | Unify field naming across multi-source data to avoid field confusion in due diligence reports |
unit_auto_convert | Enabled, forced conversion to agreed standard units | Communication equipment parameters have diverse units; unifying units ensures comparability of due diligence data |
workflow_node_retry_count | 3 retries | Temporary network fluctuations may occur during multi-source data pulling; 3 retries reduces workflow failure rate |
The parameter values provided on this page are common recommended starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material format, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require individual analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Phenomenon: When calling a knowledge base in a workflow, variable references to knowledge base selection parameters do not take effect, resulting in irrelevant non-communication equipment documents being pulled. Cause: The knowledge base ID was not configured as a parameter that can be bound by workflow variables, and only a single knowledge base was fixedly selected.
- Phenomenon: When conversing with the workflow, all historical replies from
<ai conversation>nodes are displayed. Cause: No node output filtering rules were configured, and context content from all nodes in the workflow was retained by default. - Phenomenon: Workflow execution times out, returning status code 504. Cause: The parsing timeout configuration was not adjusted, and the default duration is insufficient to process lengthy communication equipment technical whitepapers.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Run a single-node test, upload a communication equipment manufacturer’s technical whitepaper, and verify whether the extracted field results include the preset core parameters.
- Trigger the dynamic pull configuration, simulate the release of a new centralized procurement announcement, and confirm that the workflow automatically pulls and updates the corresponding data.
- Adjust the unit conversion switch, upload a test document using non-standard units, and verify whether the output results are uniformly converted to the agreed standard units.
- Run the full workflow, and verify that there are no timeout or field verification errors in the execution logs of all nodes.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.