What the data for this category looks like
Feed industry due diligence report data comes from four main sources: internal enterprise production ledgers, third-party raw material test reports, publicly available industry raw material price databases, and livestock farming feeding records. Data update frequencies vary: raw material price data updates daily, production formula documents are updated with quarterly formula adjustments, and single-batch feed test reports are released with each production run.
A single due diligence report typically includes four modules: raw material traceability, formula parameters, cost accounting, and compliance testing. Fields included are raw material name, purchase batch number, dry matter baseline content, purchase unit price, addition ratio, and test qualification flag. Content-based fields use grams per kilogram of feed as their unit, while ratio-based fields use kilograms per hundred kilograms of feed as their unit.
Constraints Imposed on Tool Calling and Plugins
The multi-source dispersion, layered update schedule, and specialized field units of feed industry data create three constraints for tool calling. First, data comes from internal ledgers, third-party test APIs, and static documents. Multiple plugins must be configured to connect to different data sources to avoid data silos. Second, update frequencies differ across data types: price data requires high-frequency scheduled calls, while formula documents need regular synchronization. Call frequencies and caching strategies must be differentiated accordingly. Third, fields have specialized units and batch association attributes. Tool calling requires unified field mapping rules, and the batch number must be included as a required parameter to ensure returned data matches the corresponding feed batch.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
TOOL_CALL_MAX_RETRIES | 3 retries | Feed due diligence involves calls to multiple data sources. A single network or interface fluctuation can be recovered via retries, preventing single-call failures |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | Single feed due diligence reports often include multiple test reports and Excel formula sheets. Parsing takes longer, so a longer timeout period is required |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 500 MB | Bulk test documents and ledger files attached to feed due diligence reports have large file sizes, so a higher upload limit must be allowed |
RECALL_TOP_K | Top 8 entries | Feed due diligence requires consideration of multiple data types including raw material prices, formulas, and compliance. Too many recalled entries increase context processing load, while too few result in missed critical information |
WORKFLOW_TRIGGER_MODE | Trigger by document type | Feed due diligence reports include different types of documents such as traceability, formula, and compliance. Corresponding workflows must be called separately based on document type for processing |
API_UPLOAD_ENABLED | Enabled | Covers document upload requirements for API call scenarios, avoiding limitations of only supporting interface-based uploads |
The parameter values provided on this page are common recommended starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Symptom: API calls return due diligence results that do not match those in the interface chat window, with some raw material price data missing. Cause: The dedicated feed due diligence knowledge base ID was not specified in the API request. The API call uses the default general knowledge base instead, and does not load the raw material price data source dedicated to feed due diligence.
- Symptom: Calling tools fails to trigger compliance testing-related workflows, and only formula analysis workflows run consistently. Cause:
WORKFLOW_TRIGGER_MODEwas not configured to trigger by document type, or the corresponding workflow type identifier was not included in the tool call request. - Symptom: Uploading local feed due diligence documents via API calls fails, returning a
413 Payload Too Largeor400 Unsupported Media Typeerror. Cause: TheUPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZEconfiguration item was not adjusted to accommodate the size of feed documents, or files were not in formats supported by the platform.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Initiate a mock API call that includes the dedicated feed due diligence knowledge base ID and the batch number of a single feed batch. Verify that the returned results include raw material traceability and test data corresponding to that batch.
- Upload a compliance testing-related feed document, and verify that the tool automatically triggers the compliance testing workflow instead of the formula analysis workflow.
- Call the multi-workflow trigger interface, and pass identifiers for traceability, formula, and compliance documents separately. Verify that corresponding workflows are called for each type.
- Review tool call logs to confirm that single parsing does not exceed the configured timeout duration, and that no field mapping errors occur.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.