What data for this category looks like
Military electronics research report data primarily comes from publicly available materials from national defense science and technology industry authorities, regular announcements of listed military enterprises, reports from professional military industry consulting institutions, and securities firm military industry research reports. Updates are triggered by events such as major industry model milestones, quarterly earnings releases, and industrial policy announcements, with no fixed weekly update frequency. Document structures typically include abstracts, industry supply and demand analysis, core technical parameters, breakdowns of key enterprise revenue, and risk warnings. Fields include research report title, publishing institution, release time, involved sub-sectors such as RF chips, military sensors, core data points and corresponding units.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the HTTP interfaces and external systems component
The multi-source nature of military electronics research reports requires external systems to adapt to API authentication logic for different data sources. Some data sources use static API key authentication, while others require dynamic OAuth tokens. These must be configured separately in the HTTP interface settings. The non-fixed update rhythm requires the interface to support event-driven pulling modes, rather than fixed-period pulling, to match the update timing of research reports. Professional technical parameters in documents must retain their original units, so interface return fields must fully map unit information from source data to avoid losing professional judgment basis for downstream systems. The long length of individual research reports also requires pagination parameters to support long text segmentation processing, preventing one-time returned data volume from exceeding the carrying limit of external systems.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Recall Count | Top 10-15 entries | Military electronics research reports have high professionality; too many recalls will introduce irrelevant information, while too few will fail to cover core content |
Similarity Threshold | 0.75-0.85 | Domain terminology is highly professional, requiring a high threshold to filter low-relevance search results |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 300 seconds | Individual military electronics research reports have long lengths, with higher parsing time than general industry documents |
Segment Length | 800-1200 characters | Adapt to the professional paragraph structure of military electronics research reports, avoiding truncation of core technical parameters |
Rerank Return Count | Top 5 entries | Focus on core relevant research reports to meet the lightweight display requirements of external systems |
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 1000 MB | Support batch upload and parsing of large-capacity military industry research reports |
The parameter values provided on this page are all conventional recommendations used as starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three common mistakes
- After calling the search interface, the returned results do not include the source file identifier of the associated research report, making it impossible to trace the data source. This occurs when the configuration switch for returning source file information is not enabled, or the interface parameter
include_sourceis not specified as true. - When uploading or pulling research report files, a
413 Request Entity Too Largeerror is returned. The size of the uploaded research report files exceeds the configured value ofUPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE. - Professional parameter units are missing from the research report results returned by the interface. The document parsing parameter for retaining original field units is not configured, causing unit information to be automatically standardized during the parsing process.
How to confirm the configuration is correct
- Call the test interface with professional keywords from the military electronics field, check whether the number of returned results falls within the range configured for
Recall Count. - View the
source_infofield returned by the interface to confirm whether it includes source file-related information such as the research report's file name and publishing institution. - Upload a long military electronics research report, check whether the parsing task is completed within the time configured for
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS. - Extract core technical parameters from the search results, confirm that the original unit information such as GHz, kilometers, etc., is retained.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.