What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Packaging and printing research report data mainly comes from public research documents released by securities research institute light industry teams, specialized packaging and printing consulting agencies, and industry associations. Updates follow a quarterly regular schedule, with temporary documents added during major raw material price fluctuations or downstream industry policy adjustments. Document structure includes overall industry trends, supply and demand analysis for niche segments such as corrugated boxes and flexible packaging, cost structure, downstream application scenarios, leading company dynamics, and other content. Fields include raw material prices in yuan per kilogram, production capacity in 10,000 square meters, revenue in 10,000 yuan. Some documents include structured supply and demand comparison tables.
Constraints Imposed on Citation Source and Traceability
The multi-source and dispersed nature of packaging and printing research reports requires traceability links to accurately mark publishing organizations, publishing times, and document source identifiers. This avoids confusing similar data from different organizations. The mixed document structure of structured tables and paragraphs requires traceability to precisely locate the page number, table number, or paragraph range of specific content. Do not only mark the entire document. Unique field and unit characteristics require traceability links to extract and display the corresponding data unit. This prevents citation errors caused by unit confusion. Differences in update schedules require traceability information to include research report publishing times. This helps users judge data timeliness.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Recall Count | Top 8–12 entries | Packaging and printing research reports focus on niche segments. Too many recalls introduce irrelevant data, while too few fail to cover core arguments |
Similarity Threshold | 0.72–0.80 | Packaging and printing research reports contain many professional terms. A threshold that is too low retrieves irrelevant documents, while a threshold that is too high fails to match precise niche scenario expressions |
Rearranged Return Count | Top 3–5 entries | Research report core arguments concentrate in a small number of paragraphs. Retaining highly relevant entries after rearrangement simplifies traceability logic |
Citation Source Display Format | [Organization Name] Publishing Time: Page Number/Paragraph Number | Sources of packaging and printing research reports are dispersed. Clearly marking organizations and time helps distinguish credibility |
Document Parsing Segment Length | 800–1200 characters | Packaging and printing research reports include structured tables and long paragraphs. This segment length preserves contextual association information around tables |
Data Source Filtering Rule | Only retain public research reports from the past 12 months | The packaging and printing industry is heavily affected by raw material prices and downstream demand fluctuations. Restricting data source timeliness is necessary |
The parameter values provided on this page are conventional recommendations used as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require case-by-case analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing.
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: When a workflow runs multiple consecutive rounds of question-and-answer, only the first round displays knowledge base citation sources. Subsequent rounds show no citation information. Cause: The workflow does not configure traceability parameter reset logic for session context. Subsequent knowledge base retrieval nodes are not correctly bound to the current session's data source configuration.
- Phenomenon: When configuring the
datasetidparameter in a knowledge base retrieval node, pre-created global variables cannot be called. The parameter input box only supports static text input. Cause: The workflow's global variable binding permission is not enabled. Or the correct variable binding entry is not selected in the node configuration. - Phenomenon: The AI returns knowledge base content with decorative transitional phrases. Direct extraction of original text fragments is not possible. Cause: The AI's content polishing switch is not turned off. Or the
Citation Source Display Formatis not configured to only show the original document identifier and content range.
How to Confirm Proper Configuration
- Run a single-round test question-and-answer. Check if returned result citation sources include organization names, publishing times, and document identifiers. Verify that source information matches actual research report content.
- Run multiple consecutive rounds of question-and-answer. Check if citation sources display normally for every round of results. No missing or confused information should appear.
- Configure a workflow with multiple knowledge base nodes. Verify that each node's citation source has a unique knowledge base identifier. No cross-confusion should occur.
- Modify any configuration parameter. Observe if retrieval result recall quantity and relevance change correspondingly with the parameter adjustment.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.