What the data for this category looks like
Data primarily comes from public solid waste disposal ledgers from ecological environment departments, research reports from vertical industry channels, and on-site inspection records from third-party monitoring institutions. The update schedule follows two patterns: monthly monitoring data is pushed monthly, and annual industry analysis reports are updated quarterly. The document structure includes fields such as disposal entity name, disposal method classification, monthly disposal volume (unit: ton or cubic meter), compliance verification mark, and region code. Document lengths and the length of depth analysis reports vary widely; it is recommended to confirm after statistics or actual measurement using your own samples.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on citation source and traceability
The multi-source, multi-field and long-document characteristics of solid waste treatment research reports impose clear constraints on citation traceability. Precise traceability requires associating fields and units to avoid citation deviations caused by confusion of disposal volume units. Data update times must be marked synchronously to distinguish the update time differences between monthly monitoring data and annual industry reports. After long documents are split, precise mapping between paragraphs and original documents must be retained to avoid losing core associated information such as disposal entity and compliance verification mark, ensuring that original data nodes can be quickly located during traceability.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value Range | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
recall_top_k | Top 6-8 results | Solid waste treatment research reports involve multi-dimensional disposal data association. Too many recalls will introduce irrelevant regional or time-period data, while too few will fail to cover complete information of core disposal entities |
similarity_threshold | 0.75-0.85 | There are many professional terms in solid waste treatment research reports. A threshold that is too low will introduce irrelevant industry general texts, while a threshold that is too high may miss accurate compliance verification data |
parse_chunk_size | 800-1200 characters | Solid waste treatment research reports contain long paragraphs of disposal process descriptions. This segment length can retain field association information and avoid breaking the binding relationship between disposal entities and disposal volume after splitting |
source_tag_enable | Enabled | Exclusive traceability tags must be added for ledgers and reports from different sources to distinguish the credibility of official data and industry research data |
return_source_detail | Enable field mapping | Field information of the original document must be returned, not just the document title, to facilitate verification of the disposal volume unit and compliance marks |
max_context_tokens | 8000-10000 | Individual solid waste treatment research reports are relatively long, so sufficient context must be retained to associate traceability information between paragraphs and original documents |
The parameter values provided on this page are conventional recommendations used to establish a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to confirm after actual measurement on your own samples.
Three common mistakes
- Phenomenon: When calling the conversation interface, the returned result does not include the referenced knowledge base document ID. Cause: The
return_source_detailconfiguration item is not enabled, or the document ID and field information are not correctly bound during knowledge base parsing. - Phenomenon: In version 3.9.2, the response only displays the document title and does not associate core fields such as disposal volume and compliance marks. Cause: The field mapping mode of
return_source_detailis not enabled by default, and only basic document title citations are retained. - Phenomenon: After long documents are split, the corresponding disposal entity paragraph cannot be located during traceability. Cause:
parse_chunk_sizeis set too small, which cuts the field association between the disposal entity and disposal volume during splitting.
How to confirm the configuration is properly set
- Upload a solid waste treatment research report document, trigger parsing, and check the parsed segment content to confirm that each segment retains core fields such as disposal entity and disposal volume.
- Initiate a query containing a specific disposal volume, check the reference area of the returned result to confirm that the document’s field information is displayed, rather than only the title.
- Call the conversation interface, check whether the returned result includes traceability-related fields such as
source_doc_idsandsource_title. - Adjust the similarity threshold to different ranges, initiate repeated queries, and confirm that the number of recalled documents matches the expected configuration.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.