What the data for this category looks like
The data for game industry research reports comes primarily from securities firm research institutes, third-party game industry consulting agencies, public financial reports of listed game manufacturers, and official approval announcement documents for game publication numbers from the National Press and Publication Administration. Updates follow event-driven schedules. Concentrated updates occur after publication number approval batches are released. Industry research reports are synchronized for update after quarterly financial reports are issued. Content is also adjusted daily alongside new game launches and industry developments. Document structures typically include sections such as core business data, competitor benchmarking analysis, policy interpretations, and publication number qualification information. Core data fields include revenue, daily active users (DAU), and retention cycles, with units of ten thousand yuan, ten thousand, and natural days respectively.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on citation traceability
The dispersed multi-source nature, event-driven update schedule, and multi-field structure of game industry research reports create multiple constraints for citation traceability. First, data sources include official public documents, third-party research reports, and corporate financial reports. Unique identification formats vary across different sources. Unified mapping rules are required to ensure traceability can link to the unique number of the corresponding data source, such as publication numbers or research report release serial numbers. Second, update schedules fluctuate with events. New data is generated in concentrated batches after publication number approvals are released. Traceability needs to support marking sources by data collection batches to avoid accidental association of expired data. Additionally, naming differences exist for core data fields. Standardized field mapping is required to ensure referenced business data corresponds to the correct source document.
How to configure the settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Basis for This Setting |
|---|---|---|
Recall count | Top 10 entries | Game industry research reports have high data density. Too many recalled results will cause redundant citations, while too few will fail to cover core question answers |
Similarity threshold | 0.75–0.85 | Terminology is dense in segmented game industry research report scenarios. A threshold that is too low will introduce irrelevant research reports, while a threshold that is too high may miss valid data sources |
Rerank result count | Top 5 entries | Game industry questions typically focus on core business data. Returning the top 5 highly relevant data sources meets traceability requirements |
Citation Source Matching Rules | Match by Document Title + Unique Identifier Field | Duplicate document names exist for game industry research reports. Unique identifiers such as publication numbers and research report release serial numbers must be used to avoid matching errors |
Traceability Data Cache Duration | 24 hours | Game industry data has a high update frequency. Caching for too long will cause traceability to reference expired data. 24 hours balances performance and timeliness |
Citation Field Standardization Toggle | Enabled | Naming differences for fields exist across different data sources for game industry research reports. Enabling the standardization switch unifies referenced field names and improves traceability readability |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material format, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three common mistakes
- Phenomenon: When searching for game industry questions outside the knowledge base, citation links for documents within the knowledge base are still returned. Cause: The
无匹配结果时不引用知识库configuration item is not enabled. The system defaults to falling back to general question answering logic, which forcibly associates knowledge base data sources. - Phenomenon: When calling the chat interface, the
citefield in the returned result is empty or not returned. Cause: The返回引用源IDswitch is not enabled, or theCitation Source Matching Rulesconfiguration is incorrect, preventing the generation of valid citation IDs. - Phenomenon: After configuring variable references in the knowledge base search card, the referenced game industry research report fields are not matched correctly. Cause: The
Citation Field Standardization Toggleis not enabled. Naming differences for fields across different data sources cause variables to fail to bind target data correctly.
How to verify correct configuration
- Upload a game industry research report document marked with a unique identifier, submit a question containing core data from this document, and confirm the unique identifier of this document appears in the citation list of the returned result.
- Submit a game industry question not included in the knowledge base, and confirm no knowledge base citations are attached to the returned result.
- Call the chat interface, and confirm the
citefield in the returned result includes a non-empty list of citation IDs. - After configuring the variable reference rule, submit a query for the corresponding field, and confirm the returned result correctly associates the field data from the target research report.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.