HTTP Interfaces and External Systems for Bid Rejection Item Bidding

Bid rejection item bidding data is sourced from bid rejection announcements on internal procurement bidding platforms of financial institutions and

What this category of data looks like

Bid rejection item bidding data is sourced from bid rejection announcements on internal procurement bidding platforms of financial institutions and public resource trading platforms for the financial sector. Update frequency aligns with the publishing schedule of the source platforms, with no fixed cycle. Each update covers one or multiple bid rejection projects.

The document structure includes fields such as project ID, bidding project name, original bidding announcement number, bid rejection reason, original bid submission deadline, re-bidding plan time, and more. Time fields use ISO 8601 format. Amount fields are measured in RMB yuan. ID fields use pure string format. Bid rejection reason content consists of multi-paragraph text.

Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on HTTP Interfaces and External Systems

Data sources rely on interfaces of financial platforms, so adaptation to financial institutions’ authentication specifications and return formats is required. Updates have no fixed cycle, so fixed polling intervals cannot be used. On-demand triggering or listening to platform webhooks is necessary.

Fields include long-text bid rejection reasons and multi-type data. Interface requests must support filtering by project number and time range. Returned fields must be configurable. Long-text content increases interface transmission and processing load, so pagination and field filtering must be supported.

Additionally, bid rejection items are associated with original bidding information. Interfaces must support associated queries to avoid repeated calls to multiple platform interfaces.

Configuration Settings

Configuration ItemRecommended ValueRationale
API_REQUEST_TIMEOUT300 secondsBid rejection reason text for bid rejection items is usually long, prevents content transmission timeout
RESPONSE_FIELD_FILTERbidding number,project name,bid rejection reasonOnly retain core business fields to reduce interface transmission load
POLLING_FREQUENCY15-60 minutesBid rejection item updates have no fixed cycle, balances data timeliness and interface request pressure
MAX_CONTEXT_LENGTH8000 charactersAdapts to processing requirements for long bid rejection reason text
AUTHENTICATION_METHODAPI keyComplies with interface authentication standards for most financial procurement platforms
PARSE_TEXT_SPLITTERparagraph separationSplits bid rejection reason text by natural paragraphs, improves model understanding accuracy

The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.

Three Common Mistakes

  • An external interface call returns a 401 unauthorized error, and logs show the token is replaced with fastgpt. The cause is that configured authentication parameters are not correctly bound to the external interface request, and the default token is overwritten by the system placeholder.
  • No valid results are returned after calling the configured model in the platform, and the interface returns empty fields. The cause is that core bid rejection item fields are not included in RESPONSE_FIELD_FILTER, resulting in filtered return data being empty.
  • An SQL permission error occurs after restarting Docker on an Ubuntu system. The cause is that the permissions of the database directory mounted by the container are not retained, and host system permissions overwrite the container configuration after restart.

How to Confirm the Configuration Is Complete

  • Use an external interface testing tool, pass the configured authentication parameters, and check whether the returned data includes core bid rejection item fields.
  • On the FastGPT model configuration page, confirm that the added third-party model identifier exactly matches the model name of the external platform.
  • View the Docker container’s running logs, confirm that there are no SQL connection permission errors, and the database directory permission configuration meets requirements.
  • Enter a bid rejection item-related query in the FastGPT chat dialog box, and check whether the returned results include correct bid rejection item data fields.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.