What Data for This Category Looks Like
Personal care product core data sources include official brand product pages, the National Cosmetic Supervision and Administration Information Platform, and product details and user reviews from mainstream e-commerce platforms. Data update rhythms fall into two categories: filing data is updated quarterly alongside official compliance adjustments; e-commerce metrics including sales volume, ratings, and user reviews are synchronized daily. Individual product data is tracked per SKU, with a fixed document structure containing these fields: product name, ingredient list, net content, applicable skin type, efficacy description, and filing number. Net content units are milliliters or grams, and the ingredient list is presented as comma-separated chemical names or common names.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Tool Calling and Plugins?
The multi-SKU nature of personal care products requires tool calling to pull data precisely per individual SKU, to avoid mixing data across different SKUs. The structured format of ingredient lists requires specifying field filtering rules during tool calling, to only extract compliant ingredient information for copy generation. Real-time updated e-commerce review data requires matching the request frequency of tool calls to the rate limiting thresholds of external interfaces, to avoid triggering access restrictions. The mandatory verification requirement for filing numbers requires configuring a compliance verification plugin, to automatically check the consistency between efficacy descriptions and filing content before generating marketing copy.
Configuration Recommendations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
maxToolCallsPerTurn | 3–5 | Matches the tool call round requirements for personal care marketing copy generation, avoiding excessive calls that cause process timeouts |
mcpRequestTimeout | 15 seconds | Adapts to the typical response duration of e-commerce data interfaces, avoiding interruptions to the generation process due to excessive wait times |
ragRetrieveTopK | Top 6 entries | Personal care user reviews cover rich dimensions; recalling an appropriate number of entries balances copy credibility and generation efficiency |
toolCallFilterFields | ["productName", "ingredients", "spec", "recordNo"] | Only extracts core fields required for marketing, reducing invalid data transmission and processing overhead |
mcpMaxConcurrent | 8 | Adapts to concurrent call scenario requirements, avoiding exceeding the concurrency limits of e-commerce interfaces |
pluginWhitelist | ["cosmeticComplianceCheck", "ecommerceDataPull"] | Only enables compliant tool plugins, preventing calls to unauthorized external services |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require case-by-case analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: The large language model does not trigger tool calls and returns generic copy. Cause:
toolCallStrategyis not configured asautoTrigger, orragRetrieveThresholdis set too high, causing the tool call branch to not be triggered. - Symptom: MCP calls return empty results when concurrent call volume reaches business peak levels. Cause:
mcpMaxConcurrentis not set to adapt to concurrency limits, orrateLimitPerMinuteis not configured to match the rate limiting rules of external interfaces, causing the interface to be blocked with no valid return. - Symptom: Tool call returns include redundant non-marketing fields. Cause:
toolCallFilterFieldsis not configured to specify filtering rules, resulting in the retrieval of unnecessary product data.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- A marketing copy generation request for a single SKU is initiated, and tool call logs are reviewed to confirm that only fields required for marketing are correctly retrieved.
- Concurrent requests matching actual business scale are simulated, and the return status of tool calls is observed to confirm that access restriction error messages are not triggered.
- The plugin management page is accessed to confirm that only preset compliant tool plugins are enabled, and no unauthorized external services have been added.
- The compliance verification plugin is tested by entering an efficacy description that does not match filing content, and the plugin is confirmed to return the corresponding verification result.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.