What the data for this category looks like
Data sources include publicly disclosed information from national defense science, technology and industry competent authorities, official equipment type approval announcements released by military industry groups, equipment technical specifications, and supporting marketing promotional materials. Updates are adjusted alongside equipment fielding and technology iterations. Regular quarterly updates are conducted, while marketing materials are updated in sync with marketing campaigns.
The document structure includes fields such as equipment model, performance parameters, applicable scenarios, promotional copy, and others. Performance parameter fields include caliber (millimeters), range (kilograms), total combat weight (kilograms), protection level, and more. Some fields are numeric, while others are text-based. The length of individual documents varies widely, from several hundred-word promotional copies to several thousand-word technical parameter manuals.
What constraints these characteristics impose on tool calling and plugins
The data fields contain a mix of numeric and text-based content, and use fixed standard units. When calling tools, strict verification of parameter and field matching is required to avoid passing non-compliant units or mismatched type parameters. The wide variation in individual document lengths requires adaptation to different content lengths during processing, to avoid context overflow or truncation of core information.
The data update rhythm is not high-frequency. The plugin caching strategy must adapt to the quarterly update rhythm to avoid resource waste caused by frequent synchronization or cache expiration. Ordnance equipment marketing content involves compliance requirements. Additional verification of content compliance is required during tool calling to avoid invoking non-compliant parameters or sensitive content.
How to set the configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
embedding_max_length | 8192 tokens | Ordnance equipment technical documents and marketing materials are mostly long texts; 8192 tokens can cover the core information of most individual documents |
tool_call_param_schema | Includes equipment model, caliber (millimeters), range (kilometers) | Ordnance equipment data fields are fixed; clear parameter mapping rules are required |
plugin_cache_ttl | 2592000 seconds | Ordnance equipment data is updated quarterly; a 30-day cache can adapt to the update frequency and reduce invalid calls |
parse_allowed_units | millimeters, kilometers, kilograms | Ordnance equipment performance parameters use standard units; parameter unit compliance verification is required |
tool_request_timeout | 30 seconds | The response time of ordnance equipment-related data interfaces is moderate; 30 seconds can cover most request durations |
max_context_tokens | 16384 tokens | Adapt to the context processing needs of long documents to avoid truncation of core parameters and promotional copy |
The parameter values provided on this page are all conventional recommendations used to determine the starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to conduct tests on your own samples before finalizing.
Three common mistakes
- When calling ordnance equipment performance parameters, the
400 InternalError.Algo.InvalidParameter: Range of ierror is returned. The cause is failure to verify that the parameter value range meets interface requirements, and numeric parameters exceeding the preset range are passed. - Ordnance equipment marketing materials returned by search tools appear as
array<object>format content that cannot be correctly converted to text. The cause is failure to configure a formatting tool adapted to nested objects; directly calling a general text tool cannot handle nested fields. - Current limiting or timeout occurs during tool calling for ordnance equipment marketing content. The cause is failure to set a reasonable concurrency level based on interface carrying capacity, with excessive concurrency exceeding the interface's supported range.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Initiate a tool calling request for a single ordnance equipment performance parameter, pass parameters that comply with standard units, and check whether correct results are returned with no parameter error prompts.
- View tool calling logs to confirm that the parameter verification rules have taken effect, with no errors of unit mismatch or parameter type error.
- Check the plugin cache update time to confirm that the cache duration matches the configured
plugin_cache_ttlparameter. - Initiate multiple sets of concurrent calls to check that the interface responds normally, with no timeout or current limiting prompts.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.