Document Parsing and Chunking for Cosmetics Marketing Content

Cosmetics marketing content data sources primarily include official materials from partner beauty brands, planning documents from financial

What Data for This Category Looks Like

Cosmetics marketing content data sources primarily include official materials from partner beauty brands, planning documents from financial institution marketing teams, and compliance filing documents. Update frequency adjusts based on new product launches and marketing campaign cycles, with no fixed schedule. Document types include product manuals, aggregated recommendation copy, live stream scripts, ingredient list documents, and more. Document structures often mix long efficacy descriptions, structured ingredient tables, product images, and compliance prompt fields. Fields include ingredient names, content percentages, applicable skin types, filing numbers, marketing copy, and more. Units include percentages, milliliters, grams, milligrams, and others.

Constraints for Document Parsing and Chunking

Mixed document structures require parsing tools to support recognition of long text, structured tables, and images simultaneously. This avoids breaking semantic links between ingredients and efficacy claims, ensuring accuracy for financial institution marketing content. Accurate extraction of structured ingredient tables and compliance fields requires the parsing process to retain table row and column structure and the integrity of specific fields. Do not extract only plain text, as this will impact subsequent compliance checks. For scenarios where images are tied to text, parsing tools must associate images with their contextual descriptions to improve the display effect of marketing content. High-frequency material updates demand the parsing process to have sufficient efficiency to match the rapid iteration pace of financial institution marketing campaigns. The presence of compliance fields requires that key information such as filing numbers is not omitted during chunking, to meet compliance requirements for financial platforms.

How to Set Configurations

Configuration ItemSuggested ValueRationale
UPLOAD_FILE_ALLOWED_EXT["docx", "pdf", "png", "jpg"]Cosmetics marketing documents often include materials and images in these formats, covering common file types
PARSE_TABLE_ENABLEEnabledCosmetics marketing documents include structured tables such as ingredient comparisons and efficacy comparisons, requiring retention of row and column structure
CHUNK_SIZE800–1200 charactersBalances semantic completeness of long efficacy descriptions and retrieval accuracy for short ingredient entries and compliance fields
PARSE_IMAGE_CAPTIONEnabled and associated with context; requires FastGPT 4.9.0 or higherProduct images and ingredient diagrams must be bound to corresponding text descriptions to avoid isolated image information
PARSE_REFERENCE_ENABLEEnabledSome marketing documents include filing references and bibliography fields, requiring complete extraction
PARSE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS120 secondsLong documents with multiple tables and images require sufficient parsing time to prevent task interruptions

The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration setup. Actual values vary based on material format, data volume, and business rules. Each scenario requires individual analysis. It is recommended to test on samples specific to the deployment before finalizing settings.

Three Common Configuration Mistakes

  • Phenomenon: The document parsing node returns empty results, or the console displays FILE_NOT_FOUND or 400 BAD REQUEST status codes. Cause: The UPLOAD_FILE_ALLOWED_EXT whitelist is not configured. Cosmetics marketing documents often use docx, pdf, and png formats. These formats must be added to the allowed list.
  • Phenomenon: Ingredient comparison tables in imported Word documents lose row and column structure after parsing, or product images have no associated text labels. Cause: The PARSE_TABLE_ENABLE and PARSE_IMAGE_CAPTION configurations are not enabled. This causes structured information for tables and images to be ignored.
  • Phenomenon: Parsed chunked content does not include filing number references or references field content from the document. Cause: The PARSE_REFERENCE_ENABLE configuration is not enabled, or matching rules are not adjusted to adapt to the reference format of cosmetics marketing documents.

How to Verify Correct Configuration

  • Upload a cosmetics marketing document that includes ingredient tables, product images, and compliance references. Check if parsed data retains table row and column structure and image association labels.
  • Review parsing task logs to confirm there are no error messages such as FILE_NOT_FOUND or PARSE_TIMEOUT.
  • Extract chunked content to verify that expected ingredients, efficacy descriptions, and references field content are included.
  • Test chunked retrieval effectiveness to confirm that long efficacy descriptions are not split incorrectly, and key compliance fields are not missing.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.