What the data for this category looks like
The data for this category mainly comes from compliant marketing material libraries provided by beauty and personal care brands, historical published beauty/personal care content copy, authorized influencer recommendation content documents from partnered creators, and domestic advertising compliance regulatory documents. Update rhythm adjusts according to brand marketing cycles: routine updates occur every two weeks, with concentrated bulk updates before new product launches or major promotional activities. The document structure of a single marketing material includes fields such as material ID, delivery channel, compliance review status, copy content, associated activity ID, effective date, and others. The delivery cycle is measured in days, and the effective date uses ISO date format.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the knowledge base retrieval and recall process
Multi-source data sources require the retrieval system to support unified parsing of documents across formats and sources, to avoid format conflicts for materials from different channels. The high-frequency update rhythm requires configuring an automatic synchronization trigger mechanism, to keep the knowledge base content consistent with the latest marketing materials. Documents include the compliance review status field. This requires retrieval and recall processes to first filter content that has not passed review, to prevent non-compliant beauty marketing content from being served. The multi-field structure requires support for precise filtering by fields such as delivery channel and associated activity ID, to match marketing content needs across different scenarios. For example, the Xiaohongshu recommendation scenario prioritizes recalling short copy adapted for this channel.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
maxContext | 800–1200 characters | Aligns with the average length of a single beauty marketing copy, to avoid truncating core compliance tags and conversion language |
number of recalled entries | Top 6 entries | Matches the typical volume requirement for single marketing material calls in agency operations, balancing content richness and loading speed |
similarity threshold | 0.72–0.80 | Filters low-relevance general marketing content, retaining brand-exclusive beauty materials that highly match the current scenario |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 60 seconds | Aligns with parsing duration for large documents during bulk updates, to avoid parsing timeouts caused by high-frequency updates |
segment length | 300–400 characters | Preserves the integrity of compliance tags and core recommendation information when splitting long copy, to avoid semantic fragmentation |
SYNC_INTERVAL_SECONDS | 43200 seconds (12 hours) | Aligns with routine update rhythms; can be manually adjusted to 7200 seconds during major promotional scenarios |
The parameter values provided on this page are all common recommendations, used as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis; testing on relevant samples is recommended before finalizing values.
Three common configuration errors
- Non-compliant review materials appear in retrieval results. The symptom is that returned content includes a
compliance review statusfield marked "not passed". The cause is that no retrieval rule filtering by thecompliance review statusfield was configured, resulting in non-compliant content being recalled. - Knowledge base updates lag behind material updates. The symptom is that the knowledge base update time displayed in the interface is later than the latest modification time of the material library. The cause is that no automatic synchronization trigger mechanism was set, and only manual upload updates were used, which cannot match the high-frequency update rhythm.
- Variable references do not correctly match target fields. The symptom is that the
associated activity IDfield displayed in the retrieval card is empty or does not match the actual scenario. The cause is that the variable was not bound to the document'sassociated activity IDfield, resulting in an inability to accurately associate exclusive materials for the corresponding activity during retrieval.
How to verify successful configuration
- A test marketing material is uploaded, automatic synchronization is triggered, and whether the knowledge base update time matches the material modification time is verified.
- A retrieval request is sent, and whether content with a
compliance review statusmarked "not passed" is filtered from the returned results is checked. - Variable reference rules are configured, test scenario parameters are input, and whether the corresponding field content is correctly displayed in the retrieval card is verified.
- The
similarity thresholdis adjusted, a retrieval request is sent, and whether the relevance of the returned results matches the expected adjustment direction is checked.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.