What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category comes from production enterprise quality inspection reports, kiln operation logs, customer usage feedback documents, and industry technical specifications. Update frequency varies by data type:
- Quality inspection reports update with production batches
- Kiln operation logs update daily
- Industry specifications update every 1 to 2 years
Most documents are in PDF or Word format. Single document length ranges from tens to hundreds of pages. Three core content types are included: physical and chemical indicators, usage conditions, and installation and maintenance.
Fields include component content indicators, operating temperature, compressive strength, and similar metrics. Units match standard industry detection units such as degrees Celsius and megapascals.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Deployment and Upgrade?
The data characteristics of this category create multiple constraints for deployment and upgrade workflows. Heterogeneous multi-source data requires adaptation to distinct parsing templates. Preconfigure exclusive parsing rules for quality inspection reports, kiln logs, and industry specifications during deployment.
The wide range of single-document lengths requires adjustments to parsing timeout thresholds and segment processing parameters. This avoids parsing interruptions for long documents and redundant parsing for short documents.
Batch-updated quality inspection reports require support for batch upload verification. This prevents repeated parsing from consuming excess resources.
Daily-updated kiln logs require configured timed synchronization trigger rules. This ensures data timeliness.
Upgrades must maintain compatibility with older parsing templates. This avoids exceptions caused by changes to existing data parsing logic.
How to Set Configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | Single refractory material documents can be hundreds of pages long, with long typical parsing times. 600 seconds covers parsing needs for most long documents |
UPLOAD_BATCH_MAX_COUNT | 50 items | The number of refractory material quality inspection reports per batch is usually large. 50 items meets requirements for standard batch upload scenarios |
maxContext | 8000–12000 characters | Refractory material documents contain many technical terms and long paragraphs. A larger context window fully preserves parsed content |
PARSE_SEGMENT_LENGTH | 1000–1500 characters | Segmented long documents must retain complete semantic meaning. This range balances parsing efficiency and content completeness |
AUTO_SYNC_INTERVAL | 86400 seconds | Kiln logs update daily. Daily synchronization ensures data timeliness |
SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD | 0.75–0.85 | Refractory material documents contain many technical terms. A higher similarity threshold filters irrelevant interfering content |
The parameter values provided on this page are standard starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require targeted analysis. It is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Symptom: In a local deployment environment, after uploading a refractory material document, the parsing node becomes unresponsive. Background logs show an
ETIMEDOUTerror. Cause: ThePARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDSparameter was not adjusted. The default timeout period is too short to complete parsing of long documents. - Symptom: After deploying via Docker on Windows, accessing the bound port returns no response. The browser shows a
502 Bad Gatewayerror. Cause: Container port mapping was not configured correctly. The host port does not match the internal service port of the container, or a firewall blocks traffic on the bound port. - Symptom: After batch uploading multiple copies of the same batch of refractory material quality inspection reports, some document content appears repeatedly in the knowledge base. Cause: The batch upload verification function was not enabled, and duplicate file identification rules were not configured. This causes the same file to be parsed and imported multiple times.
How to Confirm Successful Configuration
- Upload a standard-length refractory material quality inspection report. Check if the parsing status shows completed, and verify that parsed fields include preset content such as component content and operating temperature.
- Initiate a batch upload test. Upload a preset number of documents of the same type. Check if all batch tasks complete without timeout or failure markers.
- After configuring a timed synchronization task, wait for the preset interval. Check if kiln log data is automatically synchronized to the knowledge base with no missing data.
- After adjusting the similarity threshold, search for content related to refractory material technical terms. Verify that the relevance of recalled results meets business requirements.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.