What Data for This Category Looks Like
Automated equipment data primarily comes from built-in sensors, PLC control systems, operation logs, and sales records. Systems update real-time operational data such as current and rotational speed at a second-level frequency. Static parameters including rated power, equipment model, and maintenance cycle update when equipment leaves the factory or when parameters are modified. Data documents include structured parameter tables and unstructured operation manuals. Most fields use industrial standard units such as kW, A, m, and month. A single parameter drawing or manual can reach tens of MB in size.
Constraints on Forms and Interactions
The second-level update frequency of real-time data requires forms to dynamically pull current equipment status, to avoid filling in outdated information. Fields with multiple units require the interaction layer to support automatic unit matching and verification, to prevent mismatches between input values and units. Large-volume documents require the form upload function to support larger file limits, while avoiding excessive simultaneous file uploads. The multi-field structure requires forms to support grouped display, to reduce filling complexity. Forms must also bind a unique equipment identifier as a retrieval basis.
How to Set Configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZE | 200 MB | Parameter drawings and operation manuals for automated equipment typically have large individual file sizes |
form_field_unit_auto_match | Enable industrial unit enumeration | Most equipment parameter fields use industrial standard units such as kW, A, m, so automatic matching of input unit formats is required |
workflow_call_timeout | 600 seconds | Pulling equipment data and matching knowledge bases requires processing multi-dimensional parameters, which takes relatively long |
max_form_field_count | Within 30 fields | Automated equipment forms include multiple types of fields such as model, power, and maintenance records. Excessive fields will reduce filling efficiency |
variable_reference_pass | Enable API parameter binding | Supports passing a unique equipment identifier via API as a variable for knowledge base retrieval and workflow triggering |
The parameter values provided on this page are all conventional recommendations used as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: A
413 Request Entity Too Largeerror appears when submitting a form. Cause: TheUPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZEconfiguration was not adjusted, so the file upload size exceeded the default limit. - Phenomenon: The knowledge base search node fails to return matching results. Cause: The
variable_reference_passconfiguration was not enabled, and the equipment ID passed via the API was not used as a retrieval variable. - Phenomenon: The user selection node has no subsequent response after the workflow is called. Cause:
user_select_continue_triggerwas not configured, and the user selection result was not used as a trigger condition for subsequent nodes.
How to Confirm Configurations Are Set Correctly
- Upload a set of automated equipment parameter drawings, check the upload progress and error prompts to confirm that the
UPLOAD_FILE_MAX_SIZEconfiguration takes effect. - Enter equipment parameters with industrial units in the form, check whether units are automatically matched or verification prompts are triggered to confirm that the
form_field_unit_auto_matchconfiguration takes effect. - Call the API to pass a preset equipment ID variable, check whether the knowledge base search node in the workflow correctly uses this variable for content retrieval to confirm that the
variable_reference_passconfiguration takes effect. - Submit a form containing 25 fields, check the loading speed and submission response time to confirm that the
max_form_field_countconfiguration is reasonable.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.