What this category’s data looks like
Data for professional services funding daily reports primarily comes from financing filing public notices released by local financial regulatory authorities, enterprise dynamic databases from third-party credit reporting agencies, and institutional financing disclosure information from industry service platforms. A single record is updated daily. Each document includes fields such as full service institution name, financing round, financing amount, investor entity, disclosure date, and original data source institution. The unit for financing amount is uniformly ten thousand RMB. Financing rounds include angel round, Pre-A round, Series A and subsequent financing stages. Some records are tagged with service segment categories. The number of entries per daily report fluctuates with the number of financing events disclosed that day, with no fixed upper limit.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the citation sources and provenance link?
Data sources are scattered across multi-level regulators and third-party platforms. This requires that provenance information accurately label the original disclosure institution. Only labeling the crawling platform will lead to unclear provenance, which must be avoided. The daily update feature requires that the provenance timestamp be bound to the original disclosure date, not the data crawling time, to ensure temporal accuracy of the provenance chain. Single records have a structure with multiple investors and multi-field associations. This requires splitting original information for corresponding fields during provenance, to avoid reference errors caused by field confusion. Some professional service institutions’ financing events have cross-regional filings. Provenance must match the regulatory public notice channels of the corresponding region, to ensure the provenance chain can be traced back to the original release node.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
citeSourceType | ["official_registry", "third_party_disclosure"] | Adapts to the multi-source characteristics of professional services funding daily reports, distinguishes the provenance hierarchy between regulatory filings and third-party disclosures |
citePrecisionMode | field_based | Matches the multi-field structure of daily reports, ensures each citation is bound to the corresponding original field to avoid information misalignment |
retrieveCiteTimeout | 25 seconds | Addresses delays from multi-source retrieval, prevents provenance chain breaks caused by timeouts |
autoCiteEnabled | true | Adapts to the high-frequency daily update scenario of daily reports, reduces manual configuration workload |
maxCitePerResponse | 8 | Controls the number of provenance information entries per response, avoids content redundancy |
citeTimestampField | disclose_date | Binds the original disclosure date as the provenance timestamp, using data crawling time does not meet the time provenance requirements of daily reports |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require specific analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing.
Three Common Mistakes
- No
citefield appears in conversation interface response results. Cause: TheautoCiteEnabledconfiguration is not enabled, or theciteSourceTypeconfiguration is empty, causing the system to fail to generate provenance information. - Citation markers in reply content appear garbled and display as abnormal symbols. Cause: The
citeMarkFormatparameter is not configured correctly, or the citation markers in the original document contain unescaped special characters, leading to parsing exceptions. - For questions with no matching content in the knowledge base, funding daily report citation provenance information is still returned. Cause: The
noMatchSkipCiteconfiguration is not enabled. The system generates provenance information for all retrieval requests by default, and does not skip scenarios with no matches.
How to Confirm Configuration is Complete
- Initiate a test query containing keywords related to professional services funding, and check if provenance information matching the configuration is attached at the end of the reply.
- Call the conversation interface, and check if the
citefield and its corresponding identifiers are included in the returned results. - Construct a query with no matching content in the knowledge base, and confirm that irrelevant provenance information is not attached to the reply.
- Check the system logs, and confirm that no timeouts or field matching failure errors appear in the provenance retrieval requests.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.