What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Jewelry category financial report data mainly comes from periodic reports of listed companies publicly disclosed by domestic and overseas stock exchanges, official operating briefings released by brands, and terminal retail monitoring data published by industry associations. The update rhythm follows fixed cycles: listed company periodic reports are released quarterly, semi-annually, and annually; brand operating briefings are updated alongside monthly sales milestones; industry monitoring data lags by 1 to 2 months. In terms of document structure, listed company financial reports separately list segmented fields such as precious metal raw material costs, SKU inventory turnover, and number of offline stores, with units of yuan, days, and stores respectively. Some brand briefings include specific values for individual product revenue.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on the Citation Source and Traceability Link?
The multi-source data characteristics of the jewelry category require the traceability link to distinguish the authority and timeliness of data sources. First, the update rhythms of different data sources vary greatly, so time range filtering rules need to be configured to avoid introducing outdated industry monitoring data. Second, segmented fields have strong specificity, and full-text recall alone can easily confuse financial report content of different SKUs in the same category, so field-level matching must be enabled. In addition, data sources for jewelry financial reports are scattered, so priority rules need to be set: prioritize official data disclosed by exchanges, then supplement with brand and industry data to ensure the credibility of analysis results. At the same time, traceability information needs to clearly mark the field name to help users locate specific financial report segments.
How to Configure the Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Recall TopK | Top 8-12 | Jewelry financial reports include multiple segmented fields such as raw material costs and inventory turnover. Sufficient recall volume can cover all analysis dimensions |
Similarity Threshold | 0.75-0.85 | Jewelry financial report fields have strong specificity. A threshold that is too high will miss segmented data, while a threshold that is too low will introduce irrelevant marketing or inventory miscellaneous content |
Data Source Filtering Rules | Prioritize exchange announcements, followed by brand official briefings, and finally industry monitoring data | Data disclosed by exchanges has the highest authority, brand briefings have stronger timeliness, and industry data is only used as supplementary reference |
Field Matching Switch | Enabled | Jewelry financial reports include segmented fields such as SKU inventory and raw material costs. Enabling this allows precise recall of content corresponding to specific fields |
Data Time Range | Last 12 months | The jewelry industry has a short consumption cycle, and outdated data has limited reference value |
Traceability Information Display Format | Display data source name + release time + field name | Meets the traceability requirements of financial report analysis, and can clearly show the source and timeliness of data |
The parameter values provided on this page are conventional recommendations used as a starting point for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume, and business rules. Specific issues require individual analysis, and it is recommended to test on your own samples before finalizing settings.
Three Common Mistakes
- Phenomenon: Workflow run logs show "No specified knowledge base matched", and the returned result references the default knowledge base. Cause: The "Variable Reference Knowledge Base" switch is not enabled in the knowledge base search node, or the passed API parameter format does not match the variable structure defined by the platform.
- Phenomenon: Recalled citation entries include irrelevant non-financial report content, such as brand marketing activity records. Cause: The field matching switch is not enabled, and only full-text recall is performed, resulting in matching of other non-financial report related content of the jewelry category.
- Phenomenon: The structured result returned by the chat interface outputs the citation list before the main body content, and the display order cannot be adjusted. Cause: The
Citation Display Priorityparameter is not adjusted, and the platform defaults to displaying traceability information first.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Complete
- Manually trigger the workflow, pass the specified knowledge base variable, and check whether the matched target knowledge base ID is displayed in the node logs.
- Submit a query that includes segmented fields, such as "2024 precious metal raw material cost proportion", and check whether the returned citation list includes financial report segments corresponding to the relevant fields.
- Check the traceability information in the generated results to confirm that each citation is marked with the data source name, release time, and corresponding field.
- Call the chat interface, adjust the parameters, and verify whether the display order of the citation list meets expectations.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.