Random Inspection and Public Disclosure Regulatory Review Inquiry and Response: Forms and Interactions

Random Inspection and Public Disclosure Regulatory Review Inquiry and Response: Forms and Interactions

What this category of data looks like

Most service providers are regulatory departments including market supervision, housing and urban-rural development, and ecological environment. Core data for this category comes from the random inspection and public disclosure regulatory platform, enterprise credit information publicity system, industry regulatory systems, and law enforcement officer directory. Data updates occur on a monthly basis. Daily generated documents include inspection plans, inspection target lists, inspection item lists, on-site inspection records, rectification notices, and inspection result announcements. Most inspections do not necessarily proceed to penalty procedures, so no penalty decision documents are created. Each document has clear defined fields: inspection targets must include their unified social credit code, and law enforcement officers must be linked to their law enforcement certificate numbers. The data structure is built around the full inspection workflow.

What constraints these characteristics impose on forms and interactions

Monthly updated data sources require form interactions to support bulk import of structured data, to avoid manual entry errors. Differences in fields across multiple document types require forms to switch field groups based on business scenarios. For example, an inspection plan form must include inspection ratio and time range, while an inspection result form must link to inspection target information. The need to link to the law enforcement officer directory requires the interaction flow to automatically match qualified law enforcement officers, reducing manual selection errors. Most inspections do not involve penalty procedures, so forms do not need to include preset penalty-related fields, avoiding redundancy. Compliance requirements for inspection result announcements require forms to include preset required fields, to ensure complete and accurate announcement information.

How to set configurations

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
formInputEnable structured input mode, support CSV file uploadInspection target lists are monthly updated structured data; CSV import reduces manual entry errors
userSelectBind to the law enforcement officer directory data source, limit selection scopeLaw enforcement officer data comes from a dedicated directory; limiting selection avoids matching non-compliant personnel
Bulk import limit1000 items per batchMonthly updated inspection target lists are usually within the thousands scale; single batch import balances efficiency and system load
Field group switchingPreset three groups based on business scenarios: inspection plan, inspection record, result announcementField differences across different business documents are significant; scenario-based switching improves entry accuracy
Data synchronization cycleSynchronize regulatory platform data every 600 secondsData sources are updated monthly; this cycle balances real-time performance and resource usage, and aligns with FastGPT v4.17.0 synchronization logic
Required field validationEnable full-process validation, covering inspection ratio, inspection results, and announcement document numberInspection result announcements must meet compliance requirements; validation avoids missing key information

Three common configuration errors

  • A large number of field mismatch entries appear after uploading an inspection target list. Cause: Structured validation mode for formInput was not enabled, and non-standard CSV files were uploaded directly.
  • Personnel outside the official directory appear in law enforcement officer matching results. Cause: The law enforcement officer directory data source for userSelect was not bound, and free input options were enabled.
  • No text content is generated after a voice consultation is submitted. Cause: Voice input binding parameters were not configured, and the voice-to-text switch in the interaction flow was not enabled.

How to verify a complete configuration

  • Upload a simulated inspection target list CSV file, and confirm that imported fields match the original file as per the preset configuration.
  • Access the law enforcement officer selection link, and confirm that the selectable list only includes entries from the law enforcement officer directory.
  • Trigger the voice input function, submit a test voice clip, and confirm that the voice content is successfully converted to text.
  • Submit a simulated inspection result form, and confirm that the required field prompt logic activates.

The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against sample data relevant to the specific deployment.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.