What this category of data looks like
Data sources for this category include the China Government Procurement Network, local government procurement networks, fiscal integration systems, procurer budget systems, and supplier credit records. The update frequency is daily. Daily documents cover procurement requirements, procurement plans, bidding documents, tender documents, bid evaluation reports, winning bid announcements, procurement contracts, and responses to inquiries. Four typical entities are involved: procurer units, government procurement supervision departments of finance departments, procurement agencies, and evaluation experts. Fields include project number, procurement content, budget amount, supplier qualifications, inquiry matters, and more. Strict compliance with relevant government procurement regulatory requirements must be followed.
Constraints on forms and interactions
Scattered data sources with daily updates require form interactions to support real-time pulling of multi-source compliant data. This prevents compliance issues caused by manually entering outdated information. Diverse document types and significant field differences require adaptation to dedicated field configurations for different documents, such as procurement requirements and responses to inquiries. Handling inquiry complaints and supplier qualification verification is a core time-consuming process. Forms must include standardized field templates to reduce repetitive operations. Consequences of errors include bid invalidation, upheld complaints, and regulatory penalties. Interaction links must include mandatory verification of required fields and data format compliance to reduce the risk of operational errors.
How to configure these settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Form input verification rules | Enable required field verification and format verification (such as unified social credit code format) | Must match the compliance requirements of government procurement-specific fields to avoid bid invalidation caused by format errors |
formInput text length limit | 800–1200 characters | Adapts to the conventional text length of procurement requirements and inquiry matters, and avoids exceeding system storage limits |
userSelect data source association | Support multi-data source selection | Can simultaneously associate multiple types of government procurement data such as procurement announcements and supplier credit records |
| Single search limit | Top 10 entries | Adapts to the retrieval volume requirements of government procurement documents, and avoids returning excessive redundant information |
| Timeout threshold | 600 seconds | Adapts to the time consumption requirements of multi-source data pulling, and avoids interaction failures caused by network delays |
| Input integrity verification | Enable full-field verification | Reduces operational rework and compliance risks caused by missing key information |
Three common misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: After submitting a procurement requirement form, a "field format error" error is returned, or the system fails to intercept incomplete supplier qualification information. Cause: Mandatory verification and format verification rules are not configured for government procurement-specific fields such as unified social credit code and project number.
- Phenomenon: When calling the knowledge base, only a single data source can be selected, and procurement announcements and supplier credit records cannot be associated in batches. Cause: The multi-option parameter of
userSelectis not correctly configured, and the multi-data source association mode is not enabled. - Phenomenon: When entering JSON-format query conditions, system variables cannot be bound to generate compliant query statements. Cause: Variable binding support for
formInputis not enabled, or the parsing rules of the JSON input box are not correctly configured.
How to verify successful configuration
- Submit a test form that includes a project number and supplier unified social credit code, and confirm that the system intercepts submission requests with missing required fields.
- Configure multi-data source association, and test whether procurement requirement documents and supplier credit records can be simultaneously selected as retrieval sources.
- Enter JSON-format query conditions, and confirm that system variables can be correctly bound to generate compliant query statements.
- Simulate a scenario where single data pulling takes a long time, and confirm that the system triggers a reasonable timeout processing logic.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.