Administrative Penalty Case File Handling: Service Consultation and Response - HTTP Interfaces and External Systems

What this category of data looks like

Data for this category originates from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Daily documents include on-site inspection records, interrogation records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notification letters, hearing notification letters, penalty decisions, and service receipts. Core fields cover descriptions of illegal facts, application of discretion benchmarks, reference of legal provisions, legal review opinions, service receipt information, and additional related content. Most documents combine structured forms and unstructured transcripts. They must meet traceability requirements for case file reviews.

Constraints imposed on HTTP interfaces and external systems

Data sources involve cross-domain calls across multiple systems. Interface authentication and data format compatibility must be ensured. The daily update feature requires the interface to support high-frequency calls stably, to avoid timeouts or packet loss. Documents include structured forms and unstructured transcripts. The interface must support both structured field extraction and unstructured text parsing. Core fields involve law enforcement compliance content. Interface transmission must meet traceability requirements for non-tamperable data. It must also match the field naming specifications of internal systems used by law enforcement agencies. Archiving requirements for law enforcement case files mandate that interface return results can be fully retained. This ensures traceability for subsequent case file reviews.

Configuration Settings

Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.

| variables | Pass law enforcement subject code, case file number | Matches field requirements of administrative law enforcement case handling systems, enables accurate data retrieval |

| responseData | Combined format of structured fields and unstructured text | Adapts to the mixed structure of daily documents, facilitates subsequent case file organization and archiving |

| Interface timeout period | 600 seconds | Covers time requirements for batch retrieval of multiple documents, avoids mid-process interruptions |

| Single call return limit | First 5 entries | Matches daily updated case file data volume, avoids interface overload |

Three Common Configuration Mistakes

• Phenomenon: After the client disconnects the SSE connection, the interface does not trigger an interruption. The returned case file data is not fully stored in the law enforcement case file database. Cause: Persistent callback logic for responseData is not configured. Uncompleted request data is not archived.
• Phenomenon: Interface calls return a 401 status code, prompting an invalid token. Cause: The Authorization parameter is not carried in the request header, or an expired API key is used.
• Phenomenon: Retrieved case file data has missing fields. It cannot match the entry requirements of the law enforcement case handling system. Cause: The variables parameter does not pass the correct law enforcement subject code or case file number. Data retrieval scope does not meet expectations.

How to Confirm Configuration Completion

• View FastGPT v4.17.0 interface logs. Confirm the Authorization parameter is correctly carried in the request header, and authentication status is passed.
• Pass preset variables business parameters. Check whether the returned responseData includes preset core fields of law enforcement case files.
• Simulate a single batch call. Confirm the interface timeout period setting covers business time consumption, with no active interruptions.
• Compare retrieved data with original data in the law enforcement case handling system. Confirm fields and format meet requirements.

The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own specific samples and operational requirements.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.