What This Category of Data Looks Like
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation. The document structure linked to a single inquiry includes fields such as asset code, affiliated group, book value, approval status, and handler information. Book value is measured in ten thousand yuan, asset area in square meters, and asset code uses a fixed 18-digit numeric format. Some inquiries require linking multiple historical approval documents, with common attachment formats being PDF and Excel.
How Data Characteristics Impact Forms and Interactions
Data fields have fixed formats and unit requirements, so form interactions must align with field specifications to prevent invalid user input. The multi-group management business structure requires forms to support filtering input items by group, reducing cross-group data confusion. The sensitivity of state-owned asset data requires form permission control configurations, where different roles can only view fields within their authorized scope. The cross-system data query feature requires forms to allocate sufficient response time, avoiding submission failures caused by system call timeouts.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
formInput | Match the fixed format of state-owned asset ledger fields, e.g., asset ID uses 18-digit numbers | Aligns with the field specifications of this category of data to avoid invalid input |
userSelect | Grouped dropdown menu by asset's affiliated group, maximum 10 selections per operation | Adapts to the multi-group management business scenario of state-owned asset companies, reducing input errors |
| Form validation timeout | 300 seconds | Adapts to the response time of cross-system data queries for state-owned assets, preventing premature timeouts |
| Input format restriction | Only allow combinations of numbers, uppercase letters, and underscores | Matches the standard format of asset codes, lowering verification complexity |
| Permission control configuration | Divide field visibility by role | Complies with confidentiality requirements for state-owned asset data, ensuring sensitive information is only visible to authorized personnel |
| Submission validation rules | Pop up clear prompts when required fields are empty | Ensures submitted inquiry form information is complete, meeting service process requirements |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Phenomenon: After configuring a third-party API endpoint, the interface does not display the optional identifier for the corresponding model, and the configured model cannot be selected. Cause: The mapping relationship between the endpoint and the model input format is not bound in the
formInputconfiguration, causing the system to fail to recognize the configured model. - Phenomenon: After submitting the form, an error indicating invalid field format is returned, but no specific violating field is prompted. Cause: No field validation rules are configured for
userSelect, making it impossible to accurately locate input content that does not meet the category data specifications. - Phenomenon: When submitting inquiry forms in batches, some entries fail to submit normally. Cause: The number of forms submitted at one time is not limited, exceeding the system processing limit and causing some requests to be discarded.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Complete
- Enter the form editing interface, verify whether the field list configured in
formInputfully matches the fields required for state-owned asset management company service inquiries. - Simulate entering non-standard content, confirm whether the system's verification prompt accurately corresponds to the violating item.
- Call the configured third-party API endpoint, verify whether the input format complies with the constraint rules set for
userSelect. - Switch test accounts with different permissions, confirm that the visibility of form fields matches the permission configuration.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.