Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
What this category of data looks like
Data sources for this category include health supervision information systems, medical institution electronic registration systems, complaint and reporting platforms, and law enforcement inspection records. Update frequency is monthly. Daily processed documents include supervision inspection forms, medical institution practice licenses, rectification notices, supervision opinions, and penalty case files. Data fields include unified social credit codes of institutions, inspection dates, inspection items, rectification requirements, penalty reasons, and other relevant fields. Each record corresponds to complete process information for a single supervision law enforcement action. Text or structured records with matching structures are generated based on actual law enforcement content.
What constraints these characteristics impose on workflow orchestration
Monthly updated data sources require a scheduled trigger node to be configured for the workflow. This adapts the workflow to monthly fixed-cycle ledger summary tasks. Multi-source data requires multiple input nodes to connect separately to different system interfaces. This prevents mixing of data collected from different systems. Different types of law enforcement documents require corresponding parsing rules. These rules adapt to structured fields in inspection forms and long-text content in penalty case files. High-time-consuming links such as qualification verification and rectification tracking require parallel branch nodes to split tasks. A verification node must also be added to intercept abnormal data. This prevents unqualified information from entering the report generation link.
How to Set Configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Scheduled trigger rule | Execute at 0:00 on the 1st of each month | Matches the monthly update rhythm of data sources |
| Number of parallel branch nodes | 3 | Corresponds to three core links: qualification verification, inspection item verification, and rectification tracking |
variables | Bind the institution unified social credit code variable | Used to pass the unique institution identifier across nodes, avoiding data confusion |
| Timeout threshold | 600 seconds | Adapts to time consumption requirements of multi-system interface calls and long-text parsing |
nodeId | Bind the unique identifier of the verification node | Used for abnormal branch jumps and failure callbacks |
| Retry count | 2 times | Addresses call failures caused by temporary interface fluctuations |
| Log storage configuration | Retain all execution records | Meets requirements for complete ledger traceability and problem troubleshooting |
Three Common Errors
- Tool call errors in run mode, normal in debug mode: The phenomenon is that the run mode returns an interface call failure prompt, and the log shows credential verification failure. The cause is that debug mode calls temporary interface credentials stored in local cache, while run mode does not configure formal environment system connection permissions.
- Incomplete exported workflow conversation records: The phenomenon is that only the last 6 questions are exported, and complete records are not included. The cause is that the log node retains only the latest 10 records by default, and the full storage configuration is not adjusted.
- Multi-branch workflow only executes a single branch: The phenomenon is that after connecting three different nodes simultaneously, only the last branch's task is completed. The cause is that parallel branch configuration is not enabled, and the workflow follows single-branch priority rules by default.
How to Confirm Correct Configuration
- Trigger a single manual test task, check whether multi-source data is automatically pulled and integrated into the preset ledger template
- View workflow run logs, confirm that all 3 parallel branches execute normally with no data omissions
- Input institution codes with incorrect formats as test data, confirm that the verification node triggers a failure callback
- Export complete workflow run records, confirm that all conversations and node execution steps are included
The values given are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.