What the data for this category looks like
This category covers end-to-end procurement workflow documents for entities including central SOE procurement centers, tender offices, business demand departments, audit and discipline inspection departments, and tender agencies. Documents include procurement plans, requirement specifications, tender documents, bid evaluation records, contracts, acceptance slips, and supplier complaint materials. Data sources include internal enterprise procurement platforms, public resource trading platforms, supplier databases, contract management systems, and audit issue databases. Update frequency is daily. Data fields include procurement method, budget amount, supplier qualifications, bid evaluation results, contract numbers, and more. Units include yuan, item, batch, and more. Compliance must align with both internal enterprise rules and state-owned asset supervision requirements.
What constraints these characteristics impose on tool calling and plugin workflows
Multi-source heterogeneous data access requires tool calling to adapt to interface specifications of both internal enterprise and public external platforms. The daily update frequency requires plugins to be configured with a scheduled synchronization mechanism to ensure ledger timeliness. Diverse document types require tool calling to support field extraction from different document formats. Strict compliance requirements require tool calling to include built-in parameter verification logic to avoid risks such as audit rectification, bid rigging, and collusive bidding caused by missing or incorrect fields. Cross-departmental data flow also requires tool calling logs to be traceable to meet inspection needs of discipline inspection and audit departments.
How to Configure Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
toolChoice parameter | function | Aligns with FastGPT v4.17.0 workflow tool calling specifications, and forces triggering the specified compliance ledger generation tool |
functionCall parameter | Bind core procurement document fields | Enables accurate transfer of key parameters such as procurement method and budget amount |
| Data source synchronization cycle | 1 day | Matches the daily update frequency of business data to ensure timeliness of ledger data |
| Timeout threshold | 600 seconds | Reserves interface response time for cross-procurement platform and contract system calls |
| Parameter verification rules | Verify procurement method and budget basis | Covers the most time-consuming compliance verification links in business operations |
| Retry count | First 2 attempts | Reduces the impact of cross-system call failures, and avoids ineffective retries |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Symptom: Returns empty results after calling a public resource trading platform plugin. Cause: API access permissions for the corresponding platform are not configured, so public tender data cannot be pulled.
- Symptom: Does not generate a compliance ledger after calling a custom Python code function in the workflow. Cause: The
functionCallparameter is not correctly bound to the budget field of the procurement plan, so the tool cannot obtain necessary calculation parameters. - Symptom: Tool calling steps are not recorded in the workflow log. Cause: The full-link log switch for the workflow is not enabled. Only large model conversation content is recorded, and tool calling steps are not covered.
How to Confirm the Configuration is Complete
- Trigger the configured workflow manually, and check whether the fields returned by the tool call include key information from procurement plans and tender documents.
- Review the workflow run log, and confirm that the
toolChoiceandfunctionCallparameters are correctly passed according to the configuration. - Compare the synchronized ledger data with the procurement platform data updated on the same day, and confirm that the data update frequency meets expectations.
- Simulate a compliance verification scenario, and check whether the tool triggers the verification logic for procurement method and budget basis.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the target deployment's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.