What the Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category comes from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the national enterprise credit information publicity system, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Commonly processed documents include on-site inspection records, interrogation records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notification letters, hearing notification letters, penalty decisions, and delivery receipts. Data fields cover the subject of violation, facts of violation, applicable legal provisions, penalty decisions, delivery status, and more. Each case is linked to multiple structured and unstructured materials, and must be associated and archived in the order of law enforcement stages.
Constraints Imposed by These Characteristics on Workflow Orchestration
Scattered data sources and multiple document types for this category require workflows to connect to multiple heterogeneous data source nodes, to uniformly collect case information from different systems. Daily updated law enforcement data requires workflows to trigger scheduling on a daily basis, to ensure the timeliness of ledger summaries. Structural differences among multiple linked documents require workflows to include format conversion and field standardization steps, to adapt to extraction rules for different documents. Additionally, errors in case handling may lead to penalty revocation, administrative reconsideration failure, or failed case reviews. This requires workflows to configure failure retry and exception branch processing nodes, to ensure process stability.
Configuration Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Config Item | Recommended Practice | Basis for This Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Variable Setup | Bind case storage paths and law enforcement recorder footage addresses to variables | Uniformly manage all data source addresses required for ledger summary, avoiding increased maintenance costs caused by hardcoding |
| HTTP Request Node Timeout | 600 seconds | Administrative penalty case materials are mostly large-volume footage or structured documents, requiring sufficient request processing time |
| Failure Retry Configuration | Retry 3 times with an interval of 10 seconds | Data sources include unstable external devices such as law enforcement recorders, and retries reduce the impact of temporary connection failures |
| Branch Judgment Node | Trigger based on the case status field in variables | Split into different ledger summary branches based on whether the case has completed stages such as evidence fixation and legal review |
| Node ID Setup | Configure a unique nodeId for each business stage node | Facilitate locating specific links when troubleshooting workflow execution exceptions, enabling quick problem identification |
Three Common Errors
- Phenomenon: Ledger fields are empty in the workflow execution background, and summary reports cannot be generated. Cause: Links for case-related documents are not correctly bound to
variables, causing nodes to fail to obtain data source addresses. - Phenomenon: HTTP request node returns a timeout error (status code 504). Cause: The timeout setting is not adjusted based on the volume of case materials. Image materials from administrative law enforcement take longer to transmit, and the default timeout duration is insufficient.
- Phenomenon: The AI chat node cannot obtain the case number information from the initial user input. Cause: User input information is not passed to subsequent chat nodes via
variablesafter the judgment branch node, resulting in lost context.
How to Confirm the Configuration Is Correct
- Manually trigger the workflow, check the execution logs of each node, and confirm that the case addresses and law enforcement recorder footage paths bound in
variablescan load normally. - Simulate a temporary disconnection of the data source connection, verify that the failure retry configuration triggers according to the set number of times and interval, and that the workflow correctly marks the abnormal link in the end.
- Adjust the timeout duration of the HTTP request node, test that requests for large-volume case materials can be completed normally without timeout errors.
- Insert a log node after the judgment branch node, and confirm that user input information such as case numbers is correctly passed to subsequent chat nodes via
variables.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.