What this category of data looks like
This category of data primarily comes from state-owned asset supervision investment systems, enterprise ERP and project management systems, industry market data, and audit financial statements. Daily documents include annual investment plans, project proposals, feasibility study reports, due diligence reports, post-investment evaluation reports, and similar materials. The data update cycle is quarterly. Fields include project approval information, compliance clause indexes, post-evaluation quantitative indicators, investment amounts, and more. All data is organized around dimensions related to capital investment and state-owned asset value preservation, with no additional custom statistical fields.
Constraints on HTTP APIs and External Systems
Data sources for this category include highly compliant systems such as state-owned asset supervision platforms and internal enterprise ERP and project management tools. HTTP APIs must adapt to cross-system authentication requirements. Valid identity credentials must be passed via the Authorization parameter. Since daily documents are mostly structured tables and compliance text, the responseData returned by the API must support splitting and extracting by document fields. The quarterly update cycle reduces the need for high-frequency calls. The API must support on-demand triggered compliance data queries. It must also be compatible with field format differences returned by different systems, to avoid parsing failures caused by field mismatches. Additionally, the API must strictly follow compliance procedures for data access, and must not disclose sensitive information.
How to Configure Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Bearer {internal enterprise compliance token} | This category of data comes from state-owned asset supervision and internal systems. A compliance token is required for identity authentication, which meets compliance requirements for accessing state-owned asset data |
variables | {"project_id": "TEST001", "compliance_scope": "state-owned asset supervision negative list"} | For policy Q&A related to investment project approval and post-evaluation, pass the project's unique identifier and compliance scope variables to accurately match the corresponding policy documents |
responseData | Return the top 10 structured fragments after field filtering | Most documents in this category are structured reports. Filtering reduces invalid data and meets the precise retrieval needs of policy basis Q&A |
| Timeout duration | 600 seconds | Pulling state-owned asset and internal project data across systems requires a long response cycle. This avoids query interruptions due to timeout |
| Context window | 800–1200 characters | Most policy documents in this category are segmented compliance clauses. An appropriate window can cover the complete content of a single policy basis |
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Symptom: Policy basis fragments returned by the API include redundant content from previous requests. Cause: The current project's unique identifier was not correctly passed via the
variablesparameter, leading to uncleared context caching and reuse of historical conversation context data. - Symptom: The API returns a 401 status code and cannot pull project data. Cause: The
Authorizationparameter was not configured as required, or the compliance token used has expired, which does not meet the authentication rules of state-owned asset systems. - Symptom: The
responseDatafield returned by the API is empty, with no matching policy basis. Cause: The correct project type and compliance scope were not specified via thevariablesparameter, leading to a mismatch between the retrieval scope and the target policy documents.
How to Verify Correct Configuration
- Initiate a test call, use a packet capture tool to check the request header, and confirm that the
Authorizationparameter is correctly included. - Pass preset test project variables, and check whether the
variablesparameter in the request body is fully transmitted without format errors or missing fields. - Verify that the returned
responseDatafragments match the policy document fields stored locally, with no format confusion or redundant content. - Simulate cross-system data pulling, and confirm that the API completes the response within 600 seconds without timeout errors.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.