Policy and Regulatory Basis Q&A for Investment Project Approval and Post-Evaluation: Multi-turn Dialogue and Prompt Engineering

Policy and Regulatory Basis Q&A for Investment Project Approval and Post-Evaluation: Multi-turn Dialogue and Prompt Engineering

What this category of data looks like

This category of data covers the entire investment process materials of entities including central enterprise strategic investment departments and state-owned asset supervision departments. Data sources include state-owned asset supervision and administration commission investment supervision systems, enterprise ERP and project management systems, industry market data, audit and financial statements. Daily documents are divided by project lifecycle into annual investment plans, project proposals, feasibility study reports, due diligence reports, asset appraisal reports and post-investment evaluation reports. Update frequency is quarterly. Documents are archived by approval, implementation and post-evaluation stages. They include core information such as project identifiers, investment scale and approval nodes.

Quarterly updated data sources require dialogue context to be limited to valid data from the most recent two quarters. This avoids referencing outdated materials. Multi-stage document structures require prompt words to be split and guided by approval, implementation and post-evaluation stages. This ensures dialogue focuses on policy basis for the current stage. Multiple data sources require clear specification of retrieval scope during multi-turn dialogue. This prevents unrelated cross-system data from being included. Risks related to state-owned assets require dialogue outputs to strictly match official policy document text. This avoids arbitrary interpretation that could lead to accountability or state-owned asset losses.

Configuration Settings

Configuration ItemRecommended SettingRationale
messagesRetain the most recent 10 dialogue turns, total tokens not exceeding 8000Adapt to this category's multi-stage, multi-turn policy inquiry scenarios, avoid context overload that causes model output deviation
variablesBind the current project's approval number and affiliated industry fieldsLimit retrieval scope, match this category's multi-source, staged document structure, accurately locate target policy documents
Maximum context length800–1200 charactersAdapt to the average length of single-stage documents for this category, prevent redundant data from occupying excessive model resources
Single search limitTop 5 resultsCorrespond to the conventional retrieval result volume for core policy documents in this category, avoid excessive unrelated materials disrupting dialogue logic
Dialogue file expiration time30 daysAdapt to quarterly update frequency, balance data timeliness and storage costs
chatIdBind the project's unique identifierDistinguish dialogue contexts for different projects, prevent cross-project data interference

Three common mistakes

  • Symptom: Unclosed half-width quotation mark garbled text appears at the end of dialogue output. Cause: Failure to clearly specify punctuation closure rules for output format in prompt words, leading the model to generate unexpected punctuation.
  • Symptom: Token billing for a single dialogue exceeds the preset threshold. Cause: Failure to limit the retained turns of messages, leading to excessive accumulated tokens in the context, exceeding the model call limit of FastGPT v4.17.0.
  • Symptom: After inserting a multi-task dialogue array into a batch execution node, some dialogues do not execute as expected. Cause: Failure to bind a unique identifier to each dialogue branch via chatId, leading to mutual interference of contexts from different projects.

How to verify correct configuration

  • Test a single-round policy inquiry, confirm that the output matches the text of the specified document, with no abnormal punctuation garbled text.
  • Review the messages context record, confirm that only the most recent specified number of dialogue turns are retained, with no redundant historical data.
  • Adjust the dialogue file expiration time configuration, verify that the system automatically cleans dialogue files for expired projects after the set number of days.
  • Call the batch dialogue test interface, confirm that each dialogue branch's chatId is unique, with no context interference.

The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.