What this category of data looks like
Data for this category comes from enterprise contract management systems, compliance risk databases, law and regulation repositories, case management systems, and reporting platforms. Daily generated documents include compliance risk lists, contract legal review opinions, legal opinions on major matters, compliance review forms, and violation report investigation results. Data updates occur once per month. Each individual document includes fields such as compliance risk level, associated business scenarios, regulatory basis, and review opinion conclusions. There is no unified fixed unit, and fields are dynamically adjusted based on document type.
What constraints these characteristics impose on tool calling and plugins
Dispersed multi-source data requires tool calling to adapt to the interface formats of different systems. Cross-source data aggregation logic must be configured to integrate compliance and policy-related information. The monthly update cycle requires tool calling data source synchronization to match the update rhythm, to avoid using expired compliance basis data. Diverse document types and dynamically adjusted fields require plugins to support adaptive parsing of different document structures. Fixed field mappings cannot be relied on. Errors in this category involve major legal risks, so tool calling stability and accuracy have higher requirements. A failure retry and exception alert mechanism must be configured.
How to configure settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
toolChoice | Set to auto and specify compliance and policy-related tools | Prioritize calling compliance knowledge base and regulation repository tools to ensure accurate policy basis |
functionCall | Enable and limit the call scope to compliance document parsing and regulation retrieval tools | Data for this category centers on compliance and policy, so limit tool calling boundaries to avoid irrelevant results |
| Plugin data source synchronization cycle | 30 days | Match the monthly data update frequency to avoid using expired compliance data |
| Document parsing adaptive switch | Enable | Adapt to diverse document types and dynamically changing field structures |
| Exception alert trigger condition | Trigger after 3 consecutive failed calls | Errors in this category have severe consequences, so call exceptions must be detected promptly |
Three common configuration errors
- Cross-domain errors occur when calling the
api/v1/chat/completionsinterface. The front-end console displays CORS-related prompts. The cause is missing configuration of allowed request origins, request methods, and request headers on the back end, or failure to follow cross-origin resource sharing specifications. - The
chat:llm-model-response-emptyerror is returned after a call. The interface returns empty response content. The cause is that tool calling does not correctly match the compliance data source, or the compliance-related call scope is not specified in thefunctionCallconfiguration. This prevents the model from obtaining valid policy basis data. - Parsing exceptions occur when processing streaming return data. The front end cannot correctly splice return fragments. The cause is incorrect configuration of the stream data end marker, or failure to process chunked return content according to interface specifications.
How to verify a complete configuration
- Initiate a test call and check if the interface return content includes data related to this category, such as compliance risk lists and regulatory basis.
- View tool calling logs to confirm that the
toolChoiceandfunctionCallconfigurations are triggered as set, and no irrelevant tools are called. - Verify the data source synchronization task to confirm that the compliance database update synchronization completes once per month, with no expired data remaining.
- Simulate a call failure scenario to check if the preset exception alert mechanism is triggered, and the alert information includes specific details of the call exception.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.