What data falls under this category
This category includes daily documents such as land pre-examination and site selection opinions, construction land planning permits, construction project planning permits, red line diagrams, and planning conditions. Data sources include the national land and spatial planning one-map system, project approval and supervision platform, current land use database, and ecological protection red line data. Updates occur on an irregular basis. Data fields focus on project site selection compliance, land scale, red line conflicts, and pre-approval conditions. No unified standardized field format exists. Parsing must align with the interface specifications of each data source. Core relevance ties to compliance requirements for project approval and construction commencement.
What constraints do these characteristics impose on the "HTTP Interfaces and External Systems" link
Because data comes from multiple heterogeneous platforms, HTTP interfaces must support connections to multiple data source endpoints, and parameters must match the field definitions of each platform. Because updates occur irregularly, interfaces must support flexible configuration for incremental pull or full synchronization. Diverse document types and lack of unified field formats require accurate extraction of core fields related to policy basis. Project compliance verification relies on multi-dimensional data, so interface requests must carry business-specific parameters to ensure query results match the corresponding project scenario. Interface call failures may prevent project approval or construction commencement, so reasonable timeout and retry mechanisms must be implemented to avoid disrupting approval workflows.
How to configure settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Basis for This Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication Configuration | Bearer {AIPROXY_API_TOKEN}, fill the corresponding proxy endpoint for the interface address | Complies with authentication specifications for third-party policy data interfaces |
| Request Variables | Bind variables parameters such as project number, site selection scope, control requirements | Matches core query conditions for land pre-examination business |
| Response Field Extraction | Extract planning conditions, red line scope, control rule fields from responseData | Focuses on core requirements for policy and regulatory basis Q&A |
| Timeout Duration | 30–60 seconds | Adapts to average response latency of multi-data source interfaces |
| Retry Count | 2–3 times | Addresses temporary interface fluctuations or network jitter |
| Request Body Template | Splice project-specific parameters according to business scenarios | Matches interface format requirements of external approval systems |
Three common configuration errors
- Interface returns 401 unauthorized error, caused by incorrectly configured TOKEN value for the
Authorizationheader, or incorrect proxy endpoint address. - Interface request body cannot dynamically replace business parameters, caused by not binding fields such as project ID and site selection scope to
variablesvariables. - Returned results do not include required policy basis content, caused by not correctly extracting planning control-related fields via
responseDataconfiguration, and grabbing irrelevant data by mistake.
How to confirm configuration is complete
- Initiate a test call in the FastGPT v4.17.0 workflow, check if the interface return status code is 200, confirm that the authentication configuration has taken effect correctly.
- Pass a test project number, check if the
variablesbound parameters in the request log are fully transmitted to the interface request body. - View the
responseDatafield of the interface return, confirm that core business data such as planning conditions and red line scope has been extracted. - Simulate an interface timeout scenario, confirm that the system automatically triggers the retry mechanism, and call recovery occurs without manual intervention.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.