What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category comes from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Daily documents include on-site inspection records, questioning records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notification letters, hearing notification letters, penalty decisions, and delivery receipts. Single case file data uses identification of illegal facts, discretionary benchmark application, and penalty decision content as core fields. All documents are bound to the corresponding law enforcement case number, with no additional custom units.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on the "Multi-turn Dialogue and Prompt Engineering" Link
This category of data is updated daily and covers multiple types of law enforcement documents. Multi-turn dialogue must be bound to a unique law enforcement case number as a context anchor to avoid cross-case file confusion of retrieval results. Field attributes differ significantly across different documents, so prompts must explicitly specify retrieval of content from corresponding document types such as on-site inspection records and penalty decisions. The rigor of law enforcement data requires that multi-turn dialogue does not lose historical interaction context. The chatId must be used to associate the law enforcement case information of the current session, preventing subsequent questions from deviating from the preceding dialogue logic. Additionally, daily updated supervision data requires prompts to limit retrieval to the latest law enforcement database content to avoid referencing outdated information.
How to Configure Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Approach | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chatId binding rule | Associate with the unique law enforcement case number | Ensure multi-turn dialogue context is bound to the corresponding administrative penalty case file, preventing cross-case confusion of retrieval results |
| Single search limit | Top 3 entries | Control redundancy of retrieval results, focusing on core law enforcement documents for the current case |
| Custom prompt | Limit retrieval to documents of the "on-site inspection records, penalty decisions" type, match the current case number | Clarify retrieval scope, avoiding recall of unrelated law enforcement data |
| Single dialogue timeout | 60 seconds | Align with the standard response rhythm of law enforcement case handling, avoiding excessive waiting that disrupts usage |
variables injection | Inject the current law enforcement case number and law enforcement department type | Provide precise retrieval context parameters for the large model |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Multi-turn dialogue produces irrelevant responses starting from the second question, without associating case information from the preceding dialogue. This occurs when
chatIdis not used to bind the unique identifier of the current law enforcement case, leading to incorrect retention of context. - Retrieval results include documents from unrelated law enforcement case files. This happens when the prompt does not limit the retrieval scope to the current case number, leading to recall of cross-case data.
- Custom prompt templates cannot be used to perform targeted document retrieval. This occurs when the FastGPT version is lower than v4.17.0, as the corresponding configuration function is not available.
How to Confirm Configurations Are Properly Set
- Initiate two consecutive questions related to the same law enforcement case, check whether the second question references case-related information from the preceding dialogue.
- Manually specify a type of law enforcement document as the retrieval target, verify that recall results only include documents of that type.
- View the
messagesfield of the session, confirm that the current law enforcement case number has been correctly bound to the context parameters. - Test the timeout scenario, confirm that response duration meets the preset configuration requirements.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.