What This Category of Data Entails
This category of data mainly comes from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Daily documents include on-site inspection records, interrogation records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notification letters, hearing notification letters, penalty decisions, and service receipts. Data combines structured fields and unstructured text. Fields include law enforcement subject information, descriptions of illegal facts, discretion bases, document numbers, service times, and other relevant fields. No additional fictional statistical content is included.
Constraints Imposed on Tool Calling and Plugins
This category of data has diverse sources and updates daily. Tool calling must adapt to the interface formats of multiple data sources, including administrative law enforcement case handling systems and supervision databases. Daily documents contain both structured and unstructured content. Tool calling must support parsing different types of law enforcement documents, and extract core fields such as illegal facts and discretion bases. The accuracy of law enforcement data directly affects the legality of penalties. Tool calling must retain call logs and source markers. It must also trigger a retry mechanism when a call fails, to avoid disrupting case file handling workflows due to interrupted data retrieval.
Configuration Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
toolChoice | auto | Adapt to the dynamic calling requirements of policy basis Q&A, automatically determine whether to call tools to obtain latest regulations and case file data |
| Plugin Timeout Threshold | 60 seconds | Match the standard response duration of law enforcement systems and supervision databases, avoid overly long waits that disrupt case handling workflows |
| Maximum Number of Recalled Results per Plugin Call | Top 8 entries | Control context usage, focus on core policy clauses and law enforcement bases, avoid redundant information interference |
functionCall | Only call law enforcement policy-related functions | Limit the scope of tool calls, ensure only regulatory bases related to administrative penalties are obtained, avoid unrelated calls |
| Custom Card Display | Group by law enforcement document type | Match the classification logic of daily documents, facilitate law enforcement personnel to quickly match policy bases corresponding to case file stages |
Three Common Configuration Errors
- Phenomenon: Tool calls trigger in a loop, repeatedly calling the same policy query plugin, and fail to generate a final regulatory basis Q&A reply. Cause: No termination node is added at the end of the tool calling step in workflow orchestration. The system continuously triggers tool calling logic, and cannot complete the Q&A closed loop.
- Phenomenon: Irrelevant AI conversation content appears in tool call return results, making it impossible to display only policy and regulatory basis text. Cause: The extra conversation generation switch in the tool call link is not disabled. Unnecessary AI-generated content is mixed into the returned results.
- Phenomenon: Custom cards that match law enforcement case file formats fail to display after plugin calls, or card fields are missing. Cause: Standard fields of law enforcement documents are not bound in the plugin configuration, or the custom card display template is not specified. The content cannot match the display requirements of case file handling.
How to Verify Correct Configuration
- Trigger a test request for policy basis Q&A. Check the tool call log to confirm the
toolChoiceparameter triggers tool calls as expected. - Simulate a timeout scenario. Verify that the plugin completes responses within the preset timeout threshold, or triggers the configured retry logic.
- Send a test request with multiple types of law enforcement documents. Confirm the number of recalled results matches the preset limit, and no redundant unrelated content is included.
- Test the custom card display process. Confirm card fields match the standard fields of law enforcement documents, and the format meets case handling requirements.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.