Policy and Regulatory Basis Q&A for Fiscal Expenditure Performance Evaluation: HTTP APIs and External Systems

Data overview for this category

This category’s data covers the full workflow of fiscal expenditure performance evaluation. Daily documents include performance target forms, self-assessment forms, performance evaluation reports, supporting material lists, and rectification reports. Data sources include the unified budget management system, project declaration materials, fund payment data, business system ledgers, and satisfaction surveys. Update frequency is annual. Data fields include project ID, performance indicator value, actual completion value, fund allocation amount, supporting material association identifier, and more. Units include ten thousand yuan, person-times, percentage, and others. Data must link fund usage and performance output across the full project lifecycle, and match evaluation standards specified by policies and regulations.

Constraints on HTTP APIs and external systems

Annual updated bulk data requires APIs to support one-time bulk pulling or import, to avoid system load from high-frequency calls. Multiple data sources require APIs to adapt to output formats of different fiscal systems. This is done by passing system identification parameters via variables. Policy basis Q&A for performance evaluation requires linking policy texts and project data. APIs must support carrying policy document numbers as retrieval parameters. Verification of supporting materials requires APIs to return structured matching results. responseData must include supporting material association paths and matching identifiers. API calls must comply with fiscal system security requirements. Valid identity credentials must be passed via Authorization.

Configuration guidelines

Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.

Three common configuration errors

• Failing to configure a system proxy during initial deployment prevents connection to the unified budget management system, resulting in a 504 Gateway Timeout error. Fiscal systems are typically deployed on internal networks, so a specified HTTP proxy is required to access external interfaces.
• Failing to pass the policy document number in the variables parameter when calling the API causes retrieval results to fail to match the corresponding policy basis, returning an empty responseData field. Performance evaluation Q&A strictly relies on regulatory clauses linked to policy document numbers.
• When using the create file collection feature to upload CSV-format performance data, failing to specify data field mapping rules causes the system to fail to recognize performance indicator values and actual completion values, resulting in an import failure prompt. The field format of fiscal performance data differs from general CSV templates.

How to confirm successful configuration

• Call the API with a test project ID and policy document number, check if the policy clauses returned in responseData match the performance requirements of the test project.
• Review API call logs to confirm the Authorization token was correctly carried, with no identity verification failure errors.
• Upload a test performance data CSV file, confirm the system can correctly recognize fields and link to corresponding policy basis.
• Simulate a user-initiated policy basis Q&A request, check if the returned results include association explanations between project data and policies and regulations.

The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.

Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.