Data Profile for This Category
Data sources include the food safety sampling monitoring system, the National Market Regulatory Administration sampling results query system, laboratory LIMS, and food producer and operator ledgers. Daily documents cover sampling plans, sampling slips, inspection reports, non-compliant food verification and disposal reports, and risk control announcements. Data is updated monthly. Core fields include sampling number, inspection items, non-compliance determination results, and disposal measures. Structured inspection reports serve as the core evidence carrier, with strong inter-document relationships.
Constraints Imposed on Workflow Orchestration
Monthly updated data sources require workflows to be configured with a regular synchronization mechanism to ensure timeliness of policy and sampling data. Multiple types of associated documents require workflows to support cross-document field association search, avoiding limitations of single-document search. The core evidence being laboratory inspection reports requires workflows to first match policy clauses corresponding to inspection items, and set a verification step to avoid incorrect associations. For time-consuming steps such as formulating sampling plans and reviewing inspection reports, workflows need to be configured with automated search and verification nodes to reduce manual operation errors and time spent.
Configuration Specifications
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Base Selection | Bind dedicated food safety sampling knowledge base | Match dedicated document sources for this category including sampling plans and inspection reports |
variables variable binding | Associate sampling number and inspection item fields | Achieve precise matching between policy clauses and sampling data |
| Single Search Limit | Top 5 results | Filter irrelevant search results and focus on core policy basis |
| Node Timeout Setting | 600 seconds | Adapt to time requirements for retrieving inspection reports across systems |
| Session Interaction Button | Configure to trigger on submission of verification results | Achieve linkage between user operations and workflow progression |
| Mermaid Flowchart Call | Calibrate based on actual measurements | Generate visualized sampling process links to meet regulatory disclosure needs |
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: Knowledge base search results cannot match policy clauses corresponding to sampling items. Cause: Failed to bind the dedicated food safety sampling knowledge base. Using a general policy knowledge base leads to overly broad search scope.
- Phenomenon: No workflow response after clicking the submit button in the session. Cause: Failed to correctly configure
nodeIdto associate the submit node with subsequent verification steps, leading to process interruption. - Phenomenon: Generated Mermaid flowchart fails to load or returns invalid links. Cause: Failed to correctly configure MCP Server call parameters, or insufficient timeout settings lead to generation failure.
How to Verify Proper Configuration
- Test variable reference function: Enter a known sampling number, confirm the system automatically associates the corresponding inspection items and policy clauses.
- Verify session submit button: Trigger the submit operation in the session, confirm the workflow jumps to the verification node.
- Test Mermaid flowchart generation: Trigger a process generation request, confirm a valid image link can be obtained.
- Check cycle limit settings: Set a cycle test scenario, confirm the upper limit of times meets business requirements.
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
The values provided are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.