What this category of data looks like
Power generation group policy and regulatory basis data mainly comes from official compliance documents released by the group's internal compliance management department, as well as energy and power industry policies and regulations released by the National Energy Administration and the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission. The data is updated on a quarterly regular basis, with immediate pushes for new industry regulations or emergency policy adjustments. Each policy document uses a structured format, with fixed fields including policy document number, issuing entity, applicable scenario, clause content, and effective date. Clause content is organized by "article". Effective dates use the YYYY-MM-DD format.
What constraints these characteristics impose on HTTP interfaces and external systems
Structured policy data fields require interface return content to include metadata such as document numbers and effective dates. This allows downstream internal systems to perform compliance verification and archiving. The need for precise matching of policy document numbers and effective dates means interfaces must support limiting retrieval scope via specified parameters. Immediate updates for emergency policies require interfaces to support incremental pull mode. This avoids excessive internal bandwidth usage from full synchronization. Scenarios with multiple internal system linkages for power generation groups require interfaces to be compatible with unified identity authentication specifications. This ensures security for cross-system calls.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Practice | Basis for This Setting |
|---|---|---|
| Identity Verification Method | Pass the Authorization header with a Bearer token | Adapts to the unified internal identity authentication system of power generation groups, complies with the interface authentication specifications of FastGPT v4.17.0 |
| Request Timeout | 600 seconds | Matches the maximum waiting duration for internal system interface calls, prevents call failures caused by delays in internal processes |
| Return Data Format | Structured JSON | Meets the parsing requirements for fields such as policy document number and effective date in policy documents, facilitates direct extraction and use by downstream systems |
| Retrieval Limiting Parameter | Pass the variables parameter to carry the policy document number and effective date | Accurately locates target policy clauses, narrows the retrieval scope and improves answer accuracy |
| Maximum Number of Recalled Entries | Top 5 entries | Avoids returning excessive redundant policy content that interferes with answers, aligns with conventional usage scenarios for internal compliance queries |
| Context Window Size | 800–1200 characters | Adapts to the standard length range of single policy clauses, ensures complete display of clause content |
Three Common Configuration Mistakes
- Failing to pass the
variablesparameter to specify the policy document number when calling the policy retrieval interface, resulting in an overly broad matching scope for returned content. The phenomenon is that returned results include irrelevant policy clauses. The cause is that no parameters are used to limit the retrieval target. - Incorrectly binding the
responseDatafield when configuring Feishu Webhook callbacks, resulting in push notifications without valid policy information. The phenomenon is that the receiving end receives empty message content. The cause is that the correct return data node is not mapped. - Not setting a reasonable request timeout, triggering interface call timeout errors. The phenomenon is that errors of the type
Api response error: undefinedappear in logs. The cause is that the timeout threshold is lower than the interface response duration of the internal system.
How to Verify Successful Configuration
- Call the interface with a test policy document number and effective date, check if the returned
responseDataincludes complete metadata for the corresponding clauses. - View interface call logs, confirm that the
Authorizationheader correctly carries a valid token, and there are no authentication failure related errors. - Upload a test policy PDF file, check if the file collection creation interface returns successfully and includes parsed text content.
- Trigger a Feishu Webhook callback, check if the receiving end receives valid messages containing policy clause content.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against samples from the actual deployment.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.