What this category of data looks like
Data for policy and regulatory basis Q&A for state-owned asset management companies primarily comes from regulatory documents issued by state-owned asset supervision bodies, internal group management systems, local state-owned asset supervision notifications, and structured documents such as state-owned asset registration ledgers and approval process forms. Update cycles include annual regular revisions of regulatory policies, quarterly internal system updates, and ad-hoc special regulatory notices. Most documents are formal official papers with chapter and clause structures, including metadata such as policy document numbers, issuing units, effective dates, and applicable scope. Structured ledgers contain multiple column fields such as asset number, category, book value, storage location, and partial data is stored in online spreadsheets from collaboration tools.
What constraints these characteristics impose on document parsing and chunking
Long text structures in policy documents require that chunking does not break clause integrity, and avoid splitting a complete regulatory requirement into multiple independent chunks. The multi-column field nature of structured ledgers requires parsing tools to accurately identify column associations; splitting individual columns separately will destroy the relational integrity of data. Multiple source document formats (PDF, Excel, online spreadsheets, etc.) require adaptation of different parsing rules to ensure synchronous extraction of metadata and main content. Ad-hoc updated special policy documents require support for incremental parsing to adapt to high-frequency update scenarios. Some cross-chapter policy attachments need to be linked to the main document to avoid content fragmentation during retrieval.
How to set the configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
chunkSize | 800–1200 characters | Adapts to the standard length of policy clauses, avoids splitting complete regulatory clauses, and controls the retrieval accuracy of single chunk content |
chunkSplitter | By paragraph + semantic boundary | Adapts to the chapter structure of policy documents, ensures chunking retains the logical integrity of clauses, and avoids splitting the context of regulatory requirements |
customPdfParse | Enable metadata extraction | Retains key metadata such as policy document numbers, issuing units, and effective dates, improving content relevance and credibility during retrieval |
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS | 600 seconds | Adapts to the parsing time required for long policy documents, avoids parsing timeout errors caused by excessive document length |
chunkSettingMode | Manual configuration | Adjust chunking rules separately for structured ledger files, adapts to the associated extraction requirements of multi-column fields, and avoids only identifying the first two columns of content |
Three common mistakes
- Phenomenon: Only the first two columns of content are identified after uploading a structured ledger file, and the remaining column data is missing. Cause: The
chunkSettingModeis not configured to manual mode, and the default chunking rule is used to split multi-column data. - Phenomenon: Long policy document parsing fails, and the interface displays a timeout error. Cause: The
PARSE_FILE_TIMEOUT_SECONDSconfiguration value is lower than the actual required parsing time, causing the parsing process to be forcibly terminated. - Phenomenon: Chunked content splits complete policy clauses, resulting in inability to obtain complete regulatory requirements during retrieval. Cause: The
chunkSplitteronly splits by fixed character length, and does not combine semantic boundaries for splitting.
How to confirm the configuration is correct
- Upload a single formal policy PDF document, check the parsed metadata list, confirm that fields such as policy document number and issuing unit are included.
- Upload a multi-column state-owned asset ledger Excel file, check the parsed content chunks, confirm that all associated data of each column is completely extracted.
- Select a policy clause longer than 500 characters, check the chunked content, confirm that it is not split into multiple independent chunks.
- Upload a single policy document with a size of 12MB, confirm that the parsing process does not trigger a timeout error.
- Test the above operations in FastGPT v4.17.0, confirm that the configuration items take effect and the parsing results meet expectations.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.