What the data for this category looks like
Data for policy and regulatory basis of engineering consulting supervision mainly comes from normative documents, industry standards, and supervision specifications released by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development and housing and urban-rural development departments of various provinces and cities. Data updates are synchronized with the release of new policies, with no fixed cycle. Individual documents follow the format of original policy texts, with a structure including document title, document number, issuing authority, effective date, and main body clauses. Fields include document number, issuing unit, applicable engineering type, and clause level (article/paragraph/subparagraph). Content units are based on articles, paragraphs, and subparagraphs. Files are stored as individual policy documents.
Constraints imposed on the "citation sources and traceability" link by these characteristics
The rigorous hierarchical structure of policy documents requires traceability to accurately locate specific articles, paragraphs, and subparagraphs, avoiding vague citations. Data sources are scattered across national and local levels, so traceability information must be categorized and labeled by issuing unit and document number to ensure the accuracy of compliance verification. Updates have no fixed cycle, so regular checks must be conducted on the timeliness of cited sources to avoid referencing expired policies. Individual documents are lengthy, and the token usage of a single core clause is high. Total token count for single citations must be limited to prevent exceeding the model's context window.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
quoteMaxToken | 1000–1500 token | The token count of a single core clause in engineering supervision policies mostly falls between 300 and 600. This range covers 2 to 3 core clauses, preventing token overflow in single responses |
responseData | Return document number, issuing unit, clause number | Users in the engineering consulting supervision scenario need clear information on the issuing entity and specific clause location of policies to facilitate compliance verification and on-site handover |
detail | Enabled | Policy traceability requires displaying complete clause content to ensure citation accuracy and avoid taking content out of context |
| Single search limit | Top 3-5 entries | Valid basis for engineering supervision policy-related questions is usually concentrated in 3 to 5 core documents. Excessive entries will lead to redundant responses |
| Search sorting rule | Sorted by release date in descending order | Latest policies take priority, which aligns with compliance management requirements of the engineering supervision industry |
Three Common Mistakes
- Setting
quoteMaxTokento 2000 causes token count of single responses to exceed model limits, resulting in error returns. Reason: The token count of a single core clause in engineering supervision policies mostly falls between 300 and 600. An excessively high token limit will introduce multiple redundant clauses, exceeding the model's context window. - The number of cited documents in responses exceeds actual needs, with non-core policy content appearing. Reason: No reasonable single search limit is configured, and irrelevant files are not filtered by issuing unit or applicable engineering type.
- Cited sources returned are not the top-ranked matching results from the search. Reason: No timeliness-based reordering rule is enabled, causing older policy entries to be returned first.
How to Confirm Configuration is Complete
- A query related to engineering supervision policies is submitted, and the citation list at the end of the resulting response is checked for clear document numbers, issuing units, and clause numbers.
- The value of
quoteMaxTokenis adjusted, and the token count of responses under different values is tested to confirm the range that meets business requirements. - The same query is triggered multiple times, and the returned citation sources are confirmed to be sorted in accordance with timeliness requirements.
- Logs of the FastGPT v4.17.0 workflow are checked, and the returned
responseDatafield is confirmed to include preset traceability information.
The values provided here are common starting points and should be validated against applicable deployment samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.