Data Profile for This Category
The data for this category comes from administrative law enforcement case handling systems, law enforcement recorder footage, the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System, and departmental supervision databases. The update frequency is daily. Daily documents include on-site inspection records, questioning records, evidence lists, prior administrative penalty notices, hearing notices, penalty decisions, and delivery receipts. Content is structured around illegal facts, evidence chains, discretionary benchmarks, and penalty decisions. Fields include law enforcement subject, illegal time, evidence type, penalty basis, and other relevant fields. This category only covers business data related to administrative law enforcement case handling.
Constraints for Knowledge Base Retrieval and Recall
Daily updated law enforcement data requires the retrieval link to support incremental synchronization configuration. This avoids full repeated retrieval that occupies system resources. Multi-source heterogeneous document formats require the retrieval system to adapt to texts with different structures, such as on-site inspection records and penalty decisions. This ensures accurate matching of law enforcement professional terminology. For core business needs around evidence chains and penalty decisions, recalled content must link illegal facts, evidence, and legal basis simultaneously. Isolated clauses or records cannot be recalled independently. Errors directly affect administrative reconsideration and case review results. As a result, the relevance and completeness requirements for retrieval results are higher than general scenarios.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Setting | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
similarity | 0.75–0.85 | Matches professional term similarity for administrative law enforcement documents, filters irrelevant non-law enforcement content |
limit | Top 6 entries | Controls total context length to adapt to multi-document association scenarios for administrative penalty cases |
searchMode | Precise matching | Prioritizes recalling core documents highly relevant to illegal facts and legal clauses |
usingReRank | Enabled | Rearranges recalled results by relevance to ensure core evidence and discretionary benchmark content is prioritized |
datasetSearchUsingExtensionQuery | Enabled | Automatically expands synonymous queries for law enforcement professional terminology, covering discretionary benchmark content expressed in different ways |
collectionIds | Bind target administrative penalty case knowledge base ID | Ensures the retrieval node only calls authorized administrative law enforcement case handling knowledge bases |
Common Misconfigurations
- After importing a bilingual law enforcement knowledge base, the large model fails to recall corresponding Chinese content. The cause is that
datasetSearchUsingExtensionQueryis not enabled, and professional word segmentation rules are not configured for the administrative law enforcement scenario. This results in Chinese professional terms not being correctly identified and matched. - After associating the target knowledge base, the model prompts that no specific knowledge base content is provided when generating responses. The cause is that
collectionIdsis not correctly configured in the retrieval node, or global variables are not correctly mapped to retrieval node parameters in the workflow. - The number of returned retrieval results does not match the set
limit. The cause is that the initial recall upper limit is not adjusted synchronously after enablingusingReRank, or thesimilaritythreshold is set too high. This filters out some eligible law enforcement documents in advance.
How to Verify Correct Configuration
- Log in to the FastGPT v4.17.0 platform, navigate to the knowledge base retrieval node configuration page in the workflow, and confirm that
collectionIdsis bound to the target administrative penalty case knowledge base. - Trigger a retrieval test simulating an administrative law enforcement scenario, and check whether target documents such as on-site inspection records and penalty decisions are included in the retrieval log.
- Adjust the
similaritythreshold to verify whether the relevance of recalled results meets the professional matching requirements of administrative law enforcement case handling. - After enabling
usingReRank, check whether the rearranged results rank core legal clauses and evidence lists at the top.
The values provided are common starting points and should be evaluated against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.