What data for this category looks like
The data related to document and material drafting for coal mine production mainly comes from underground operation logs, safety regulation documents, production scheduling daily reports, acceptance slips, and safety briefing documents. The data update rhythm changes with operation scenarios. Shift-by-shift operation logs are updated in real time. Monthly safety regulations are revised every quarter. Most document structures include operation scenario identifiers, parameter indicators, and responsible entity columns. Fields include working face number, coal output, gas concentration, operation duration, and other items. Common units are meters, tons, ppm, and hours.
What constraints these characteristics impose on the tool calling and plugin link
The data characteristics of coal mine production documents impose multiple constraints on the tool calling and plugin link. Real-time operation data must connect to the real-time interfaces of underground sensors. Tools must support high-frequency, low-latency data pulling. Parameters with dedicated units require plugins to automatically identify and verify unit matching. This prevents incorrect parameter expressions. Fixed-format document templates require plugins to automatically fill corresponding fields when called. They must also retain the compliant signature and approval column structure. Coal mine documents must comply with industry safety regulations. The compliance verification plugin for tool calls must be bound to the coal industry’s dedicated safety standard library.
How to set the configuration
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
toolChoice | Forced function calling | Ensure tool calls strictly match the preset logic for document drafting, avoid unstructured output |
functionCall | Bind to coal mine document-specific function set | Cover three core drafting needs: operation log filling, compliance verification, and format matching |
| Plugin authentication method | Unified key management pool | Prevent a single plugin key leak from affecting the entire process, comply with production safety and compliance requirements |
| Default file upload format | All formats optional | Adapt to multi-type upload scenarios for coal mine documents, including scanned copies, Excel logs, and PDF regulations |
| Single tool call limit | Top 3 entries | Match the display needs of core parameters for single-scenario coal mine documents |
| Context window length | 8000–12000 token | Cover the context needs of a complete single-operation document |
Three common mistakes
- When calling an MCP plugin to generate an operation document, empty parameter fields are returned. The cause is failure to connect to the coal mine-specific real-time operation data source interface, so core parameters such as working face number and coal output cannot be obtained.
- Key leakage risks occur when configuring plugin authentication. The cause is failure to use a unified key management method. After the key of a single plugin is exposed, full-link updates cannot be completed quickly.
- After adding a model connected via OneAPI, an empty error is reported when entering the key. The cause is failure to correctly match the model’s interface address and key permission scope, and failure to adapt to call restrictions in production scenarios.
How to confirm the configuration is complete
- Trigger a tool call, check if the generated document automatically fills in dedicated fields such as working face number and gas concentration, confirm that the function call logic takes effect.
- Upload coal mine documents in different formats, confirm that the system can recognize and parse the corresponding content, verify that the all-format upload configuration takes effect.
- View the authentication management interface, confirm that all plugin keys are included in the unified management pool, and allow quick batch key updates.
- Call the model connected via OneAPI, enter a test key without receiving an empty error, confirm that the interface and permission configuration is correct.
The values provided here are common starting points, and should be evaluated against the reader’s own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.