What data for this category looks like
Data for this category typically comes from the Random Inspection and Public Disclosure Supervision platform, the enterprise credit information public disclosure system, industry supervision systems, and the law enforcement officer directory. Daily processed documents include inspection plans, inspection target lists, inspection item lists, on-site inspection records, rectification notices, and inspection result disclosures. Data updates occur monthly. Core fields include supervision subject number, unified social credit code of inspection targets, law enforcement officer ID number, and inspection item category. No custom special units are used. Most documents use structured or semi-structured formats.
Constraints imposed by these features on HTTP interfaces and external systems
This category’s data sources are scattered and updated monthly. HTTP interfaces must support regular incremental or full data pulls to avoid duplicate pulls that consume system resources. Document types include multiple structured formats such as lists, records, and notices. Interfaces must adapt to parsing logic for multiple types of request bodies and response bodies. Core fields such as the unified social credit code of inspection targets and law enforcement officer ID number require strict validation. Interfaces must include built-in legal verification rules. Inspection results must be synchronized to the disclosure platform. Interfaces must support idempotent calls to prevent regulatory issues caused by repeated submissions.
How to set configurations
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Authorization | Bearer {dedicated supervision platform API key} | Complies with authentication configuration specifications for FastGPT v4.17.0, and meets standard authentication requirements for supervision interfaces |
| Single request timeout | 600 seconds | Adapts to response duration requirements for monthly bulk data pulls, prevents data synchronization from being interrupted mid-process |
| Maximum number of entries returned per request | 800–1200 entries | Adapts to interface return limits of supervision platforms, avoids data overload |
variables | Bind core fields such as the unified social credit code of inspection targets and law enforcement officer ID number | Enables dynamic matching between interface parameters and business data, reduces hardcoding modification costs |
responseData | Extract core business fields such as inspection results, on-site inspection records, and disclosure information | Filters invalid response content, improves efficiency of subsequent data processing |
| Cross-domain access whitelist | Configure domain names of supervision platforms and enterprise credit information public disclosure systems | Complies with browser cross-domain access security rules, allows legitimate external systems to call interfaces |
Three common mistakes
- Symptom: Interface returns status code 403, unable to pull inspection target lists or inspection plan data. Cause: The
Authorizationparameter is not configured correctly, and an invalid or expired API key is used. - Symptom: Repeated inspection tasks are generated after interface calls, leading to repeated disturbing of enterprises. Cause: Idempotent request logic is not set, repeated triggering of task generation processes, and business single-execution requirements are not followed.
- Symptom: Inspection result disclosure fields are missing from pulled response data, making subsequent disclosure processes impossible to complete. Cause: The
responseDataparameter is not configured correctly, required core business fields are not specified, leading to valid data being incorrectly filtered.
How to confirm configurations are correct
- Call the test interface, check if the correct authentication information is included in the returned response headers, confirm that the
Authorizationconfiguration is effective. - Initiate a bulk data pull request, verify that the number of returned entries matches the monthly updated data volume in the supervision platform backend, confirm that single request parameter configurations are reasonable.
- Check if the fields bound to
variablesmatch the core fields in business documents, confirm that dynamic parameter configurations are correct. - Review the domain name list in cross-domain configurations, confirm that only authorized external systems are allowed access, confirm that security configurations comply with rules.
The values given are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.