What Data for This Category Looks Like
Data for this category is sourced from national public resource trading platforms, local public resource trading platforms, engineering approval systems, and bidding and tendering supervision systems. The update frequency is daily. Daily processed documents include bidding announcements, qualification pre-qualification documents, bidding documents, tender documents, bid evaluation reports, successful bid candidate notices, and successful bid result announcements. Data fields cover project section information, qualification requirements, tender quotes, bid evaluation expert records, successful bid results, and more. This data is maintained by industry authorities, public resource trading centers, and bidding agency institutions.
What Constraints Do These Characteristics Impose on Workflow Orchestration
Multiple data sources require workflows to adapt to interface specifications of different platforms, preventing format incompatibility issues during data pulling. The daily update frequency requires workflows to include timed trigger nodes, ensuring timeliness of core review data. Diverse document types require workflows to split into independent nodes for bidding, tendering, bid evaluation and other stages, adapting to field parsing rules for different documents. Core time-consuming steps for this category include splitting project sections, verifying bid evaluation expert records, and handling objections and complaints. This requires workflows to set parallel nodes for multi-section review, and configure objection handling branches. Professional business fields such as qualifications, performance records, and bill of quantities differ from general scenarios. Bind variables to store corresponding data, and set exception branches to handle missing fields or format errors. This prevents review logic deviations from causing outcomes such as suspended bid results or project delays.
Configuration Settings
Reference only; verify against the target FastGPT release and deployment documentation.
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Timed Trigger Cycle | 600–1440 seconds | Matches the daily data update frequency, balances timeliness and system resource usage |
variables Binding Fields | Match section ID, tender quote, and bid evaluation expert ID by document type | Accurately associate core business data, ensuring accuracy of review logic |
| Node ID Binding | Assign unique nodeId by business stage | Facilitates workflow debugging and exception locating, adapting to multi-stage parallel processing scenarios |
| File Upload Node Configuration | Supports PDF and Word formats, maximum single file size 1000 MB | Adapts to format and size requirements for common documents in this category |
| Data Pull Limit | 100 items | Adapts to interface return limits of public resource trading platforms |
| Failure Retry Count | 3–5 retries | Addresses request failures caused by temporary interface fluctuations, reducing the need for manual intervention |
Three Common Mistakes
- Tool call nodes return a 429 Request rate increased too quickly status code. This happens when request rate limits are not configured, and too many calls initiated in a short time trigger platform current limiting.
- Database connection nodes cannot accept port number inputs. This happens when advanced configuration options are not expanded, and edit permissions for port parameters are not correctly enabled.
- Workflows cannot trigger file upload tests. This happens when file upload functionality is not enabled in node settings, and allowed upload file type ranges are not configured.
How to Confirm Proper Configuration
- Trigger a test workflow, verify that
variablesbound fields are correctly extracted from uploaded bidding documents. - Simulate cross-data source data pull requests, confirm that interface calls across different platforms do not produce abnormal error messages.
- Upload test files that match the configured format, verify that file upload nodes can normally receive and parse content.
- Trigger exception scenarios with missing fields, confirm that workflows enter the failure handling process in accordance with preset rules.
The values given are common starting points and should be measured against the reader's own samples.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-28.